Welcome!
Hello, Miijumaaru! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
|---|
|
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Darwin Cormier
Please ignore everything Darwin Cormier said to you. This is a long-term vandal who sets out to troll people. --Yamla (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I have the same problem today with this Darwin Cormier Person
Hi, Just saying hi (a little moral support) because I got all freaked out and upset this guy un-did a pretty benign edit of mine and claimed I was vandalizing (not true). Looks like this guy is the problem not us. Have a great Day! Jjamulla (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
WTA Finals doubles
Hello. You were correct on Erin Routliffe being the first New Zealander to win a WTA Finals title. I found and added a reference for it. You must have good records! Shrug02 (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I often try to find sources when possible, but sometimes it may not always work. Your tone on the other hand, is like you’re outing me as if I’m a criminal. Miijumaaru (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, sources are mandatory, esp. with BLPs. You know this. As for outing as a criminal, that's a very strange conclusion. Drmies (talk) 22:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- It’s because you’re talking like a dictator and I do not like dictators or anything that paints me as a bad guy, like as if the staff don’t want me here. Also,I have a learning disorder. I try to find documents, a news article or a social media post but there are times I may be unsuccessful. Miijumaaru (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you have that, but it doesn't give you the right to yell at me. No one is painting you as a bad guy, no one is oppressing you, and we don't have "staff". I'm a volunteer, just like you. If you cannot find a source for something involving the life of a living person, don't make the edit. Drmies (talk) 22:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- It’s because you’re talking like a dictator and I do not like dictators or anything that paints me as a bad guy, like as if the staff don’t want me here. Also,I have a learning disorder. I try to find documents, a news article or a social media post but there are times I may be unsuccessful. Miijumaaru (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m not yelling at you, you’re the one making me uncomfortable. Just leave me alone. And I did leave a link in the summary. Miijumaaru (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You left a bare URL to an Instagram post in the edit summary. Don't do that again please. Drmies (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are being far too bossy. I do not get on with you at all because you are discriminating me. I always hate it when I’m having bad blood with staff who think a social media post is not good enough. Miijumaaru (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Please do not use template main in the lead
Wikipedia does not allow the use of template "main" above the lead section. You changed with 2025 Australian Open – Women's singles but it has been corrected. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- That was just an error. Miijumaaru (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- You also did it on 2025 Australian Open – Men's singles, 2025 Australian Open – Men's doubles, and 2025 Australian Open – Women's doubles, so it was a multi-error. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Annoyed at rule changes
I thought that the previous articles were all shown that way. If anything, the bossy higher-ups like yourself must have changed the rules and I was unaware. You and other staff are only dragging me into an argument because right now I don’t feel very comfortable at all. Miijumaaru (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you are talking about "main" it's always been explained that way in the template. Many folks just don't read properly. Many articles contain the error but we try to correct them as best we can. That's why I figured I would let you know in case you missed it. If that's being bossy than so be it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- That’s the problem, I have a learning disorder and some with such conditions cannot read properly. The staff instead only care about coming off as super, super, super bossy and therefore discriminate against those who can’t read. Miijumaaru (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well that's a load of hogwash because you are coming off as a privileged brat. If one can't read maybe one should not be editing an encyclopedia. And if someone saying "Wikipedia does not allow the use of template "main" above the lead section" comes across to you as "bossy" you need to find some other place to work. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Administrator @Drmies: tried to have a conversation with you above and you pulled the same crap. If you make an error and someone points it out to you, they aren't being bossy, but you using terms like "bossy", "criminal", and "dictator" will certainly get Wikipedia's attention and paint you in a bad light. Stop that and listen to people without throwing colorful terms in their face. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I felt badly offended and discriminated against, that's why. I have a tendency to be very snappy which is why I overreacted. Again, we do not get on at all. Please stop dragging me into this altercation. Just because someone makes errors, doesn't mean you get to abuse powers and go all mad at them. I apologize, OK? Miijumaaru (talk) 08:23, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have no powers here. And you making an error is no issue at all. We all do. I make plenty and I'm always learning here when people tell me. You calling me bossy, you getting snappy, you calling people a dictator, and you getting offended for someone pointing out a mistake... that's a BIG BIG problem. That needs to stop now, right now. You dragged yourself into this Miijumaaru. Maybe others let you get away with snappiness, but I won't. At wikipedia you work with others.... lots of compromising will happen, and if you edit tennis articles we will surely intersect often. Hopefully working together. And of course you apologize right after saying I abuse my powers again, so not accepted! I'm moving on, but if this happens again with us it'll go straight to administration so they can deal with you. Wikipedia needs editors who work together, compromise, and do their best to understand each other. If it's the obverse, then those editors don't last here long. Good luck to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Look, I made an apology and you refused to accept it. That's a sign that we absolutely do not get along. I will try to change my image to become more kind towards staff but remember that I overreacted towards you and that's why we got into a fight. Please understand, bye for now. Miijumaaru (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have no powers here. And you making an error is no issue at all. We all do. I make plenty and I'm always learning here when people tell me. You calling me bossy, you getting snappy, you calling people a dictator, and you getting offended for someone pointing out a mistake... that's a BIG BIG problem. That needs to stop now, right now. You dragged yourself into this Miijumaaru. Maybe others let you get away with snappiness, but I won't. At wikipedia you work with others.... lots of compromising will happen, and if you edit tennis articles we will surely intersect often. Hopefully working together. And of course you apologize right after saying I abuse my powers again, so not accepted! I'm moving on, but if this happens again with us it'll go straight to administration so they can deal with you. Wikipedia needs editors who work together, compromise, and do their best to understand each other. If it's the obverse, then those editors don't last here long. Good luck to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I felt badly offended and discriminated against, that's why. I have a tendency to be very snappy which is why I overreacted. Again, we do not get on at all. Please stop dragging me into this altercation. Just because someone makes errors, doesn't mean you get to abuse powers and go all mad at them. I apologize, OK? Miijumaaru (talk) 08:23, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- That’s the problem, I have a learning disorder and some with such conditions cannot read properly. The staff instead only care about coming off as super, super, super bossy and therefore discriminate against those who can’t read. Miijumaaru (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, since I was pinged, and since I haven't responded to your final message, above--I am not staff. We are not staff. There is no "staff": even "administration" is not staff--they are editors who have been approved by the community of editors to perform certain tasks, and I have not acted in an administrative capacity. The whole "you must provide sources for your information", any editor could have told you that. "Social media sources are usually not sufficient for a BLP", same. "Provide properly cited sources in the text, not just a social media bare URL in the edit summary", same. Fyunck opposes some of the things that I think are proper, and that's fine: the community, on that matter, agrees with them, not with me, and that's the way it is. But we don't go around calling each other names. And on that matter, the only power Fyunck has is rhetorical: the power of their words and their knowledge of policy and guidelines, and that's the same for most of us. So no power was abused because no power was exerted. I don't even really know what y'all's dispute is about, I don't know what "rule changes" are at stake here, but if I would have to judge as an admin on who's editing against consensus, I am going to make sure that I know what the consensus is and hold editors to it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
2025 Internationaux de Strasbourg – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2025 Internationaux de Strasbourg – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 06:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I sadly couldn’t find an article on the main WTA website as of now. Miijumaaru (talk) 07:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I haven’t been able to find another credible source to link in order to meet your standards, because there’s not a lot of news articles around, therefore I have equipped a “One source” tag. Miijumaaru (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
2025 Hamburg Open – Men's singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2025 Hamburg Open – Men's singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 06:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I haven’t been able to find another credible source to link in order to meet your standards, because there’s not a lot of news articles around, therefore I have equipped a “One source” tag. Miijumaaru (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
I know the qualifying draw page was officially published on the ATP website. Staff seem to disagree with me unfortunately. Miijumaaru (talk) 07:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
Hello. I have restored the perfectly valid citation which you removed from the 2025 French Open - women's singles page with no reason given. The BBC is not only a reliable source but is a secondary one, unlike the WTA website which for these purposes is a primary source. Please do not remove this again without going to the appropriate talk page and gaining consensus for why it should be done. If you do, I will report you for edit warring which I hope you will agree, would be an unfortunate and totally avoidable situation. Best wishes. Shrug02 (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I thought I was prompted to remove it because of the “edit citation” tag. Also, I think you tried to report as a hate attack on me. You can’t even spell the word “warning”! Miijumaaru (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- What are you on about? I haven't reported you nor did I write the word warning. You need to calm down. Reading previous messages on this talk page it seems you are no stranger to this sort of accusation and behaviour. There was no edit citation tag on the citation you removed. Shrug02 (talk) 21:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- It’s just often hard for me to read it all at once as I have a learning disorder, and it means I can often be very hasty which leads to incidents and mistakes like this. Stop being so bossy. Miijumaaru (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I am not being bossy. That's another thing you've accused others of. Just calm down and maybe think before you type. It's a simple situation that we can put down to a misunderstanding ok? Shrug02 (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I do not like being told to calm down so brashly. I also don’t like bossy people who act like they’re the authority. It was an accident and you just happened to get very angry. Miijumaaru (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I am not being bossy. That's another thing you've accused others of. Just calm down and maybe think before you type. It's a simple situation that we can put down to a misunderstanding ok? Shrug02 (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- It’s just often hard for me to read it all at once as I have a learning disorder, and it means I can often be very hasty which leads to incidents and mistakes like this. Stop being so bossy. Miijumaaru (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- What are you on about? I haven't reported you nor did I write the word warning. You need to calm down. Reading previous messages on this talk page it seems you are no stranger to this sort of accusation and behaviour. There was no edit citation tag on the citation you removed. Shrug02 (talk) 21:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2025 US Open – Men's singles
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 US Open – Men's singles, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
I was sure that was not an error. You might have read it incorrectly. It’s just that there’s loads of broken records to fit there! Miijumaaru (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
2025 Suzhou WTA 125 – Doubles moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Suzhou WTA 125 – Doubles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sadly there was no articles available from the previous tournament, back when it was an ITF. Miijumaaru (talk) 15:29, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hopefully someone out there can link an article before any matches are played. It would be weird to not have an active page when a match is going on just because it's stuck in the draft space due to being unsourced. Miijumaaru (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sometimes articles are just hard to track down. That's the reality. Miijumaaru (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hopefully someone out there can link an article before any matches are played. It would be weird to not have an active page when a match is going on just because it's stuck in the draft space due to being unsourced. Miijumaaru (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
“seeded players” section
Hi! I noticed a few times you miscalculate the “points after” column when a player moves further into a tournament (re: wuhan open). Please verify the calculations. QueerMarxist (talk) 10:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm better at just filling scores anyway. Points is just too complicated. Miijumaaru (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Please add sources with new information
Just an fyi, sources are not a luxury at Wikipedia. If you add something it requires a source. Please remember to add the source along with the info so readers can check out where the info came from. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Some are just harder to find than others. That's the reality. Miijumaaru (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- I certainly agree there. But if it doesn't have a reliable source we cant use it per Wikipedia. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- I did use news articles though. That’s usually the best place to go. Miijumaaru (talk) 10:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- I certainly agree there. But if it doesn't have a reliable source we cant use it per Wikipedia. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of 2026 Adelaide International – Women's singles
The page 2026 Adelaide International – Women's singles has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I didn’t originally post it though. Miijumaaru (talk) 21:12, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Drafts
Please familiarize yourself with WP:DRAFTNOCAT, a Wikipedia rule which states that pages in draftspace are not allowed to be filed in categories as if they were already finished articles in mainspace. Drafts must stay out of any categories while they're in draft, and may be added to categories only after the content has been moved into a mainspace article — in the meantime, any category placeholders you want on the page must be disabled, either with a leading colon in front of the word category or wrapped in the {{draft categories}} template, so that the category statement functions as a text link to the category without filing the page in the category.
I am, however, constantly having to take new drafts you've created out of categories, and having to revisit many of them multiple times because you've put the pages back into the categories again after they've already been pulled out of categories previously, and it's becoming disruptive. So please do not file drafts in categories while they're still in draftspace. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- DO NOT FILE DRAFTS IN CATEGORIES. Bearcat (talk) 03:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- I was about to remove it, you bossy dictator! Miijumaaru (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Intimidation, and unawareness
I was only ripping the source codes directly but didn’t realise I had to actually remove those particular points. The way you worded your statement makes you come off as authoritarian and made me too scared to continue. You know I have a learning disorder. Miijumaaru (talk) 23:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Please don't use color only to show tennis seeds who lost, It's against MOS
Your addition of color to 2026 Australian Open – Men's singles goes against Wikipedia MOS. Those with vision issues can't see it. Never use color only for data... there must be a symbol and there must be a key to tell readers why color is there to begin with. Plus never use bgcolor. That has been removed from html for years now. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- Don’t blame me. Others have also messed up and used the wrong code, and how was I supposed to know that I hurt a vision-impaired person? Like, why is this code still in the data when you say it’s meant to be banned due to visionary issues? It was just a mistake, and you got angry at me. Now, move on. Miijumaaru (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- I have blamed others too. You aren't the only one. I didn't report you or anything... just letting you know that color can't be used like that and that bgcolor should never be used anymore. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- The color code has been removed from the table for now. We'll see if an alternative, more visible way can be achieved. Miijumaaru (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- I have blamed others too. You aren't the only one. I didn't report you or anything... just letting you know that color can't be used like that and that bgcolor should never be used anymore. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Julie Paštiková moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Julie Paštiková. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you moved this into the main article space? There is nothing to indicate notability, that I can see at least. The sources are a mix of passing mentions and primary sources, which do not meet WP:GNG. And I don't think anything in this player's history comes even close to satisfying WP:NTENNIS, either. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
2026 BNP Paribas Open – Men's singles, seeded player chart error
In creating the article 2026 BNP Paribas Open – Men's singles the key symbols for the seeded players is the same symbols used for defending points. The defending points has to be different symbols than the key. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not you again, bossy boots, because we already don't get along very well. That was an error that I had no knowledge of and you figured it was fun to take your anger out on me and frame me as the offender. Someone might have accidentally put it in and yet I'm the one who is getting blamed. Miijumaaru (talk) 11:51, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- And there is now a record of your incivility with a warning. The page creation record shows you created the article with the error in it. You have to do your best to check these things when you create an article. I simply pointed out the error and I corrected it. This chip on your shoulder is going to create problems for you at Wikipedia so I'd check that at the door. The other thing you could have done is to ask the template creator of the legend to change their symbols. Either way would work. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I usually look over thoroughly when making a page, but sometimes there’s that one slip and you bash me into the ground for it. Until whenever this warning expires, then I will leave this place until you stop taking your anger out on me. I will officially stop creating articles for the foreseeable future because I don’t want to constantly end up being on bad terms. Farewell. Miijumaaru (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Did you actually read the sentence I wrote? I said "In creating the article 2026 BNP Paribas Open – Men's singles the key symbols for the seeded players is the same symbols used for defending points. The defending points has to be different symbols than the key." That's it. If you feel that is bashing then perhaps you are not suited for teamwork at Wikipedia. Most of your work is great but you have to be able to take an error being pointed out when you created the page with an error. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I tried to read it, but I have a severe learning disorder and I still cannot look past being on bad terms with you. I’m a very anti-social person already in real-life so of course teamwork is not meant for me, which is why I’m stopping with article creation indefinitely. I would rather blame the creator of the original template if you ask me. Miijumaaru (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- And teamwork is a requirement for Wikipedia. You must work with others or the system breaks down. One unfortunate thing about Wikipedia is that it's like Yelp reviews. When an appliance works great no one leaves reviews, but they sure do when it breaks. There could be 1000 edits by you that are fine and no one says a thing. You make three errors and are told about them. That's way lopsided towards good, but all you see is bad. That's how you have to look at things. Many of my edits surface around fixing things that don't follow tennis project protocol or are straight-up vandalism. I saw the error and I corrected it, because our thousands of readers would be confused. Since you created multiple articles with this same error I let you know on your talk page about it so that it wouldn't happen in the future. That's all I attempted to do. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I tried to read it, but I have a severe learning disorder and I still cannot look past being on bad terms with you. I’m a very anti-social person already in real-life so of course teamwork is not meant for me, which is why I’m stopping with article creation indefinitely. I would rather blame the creator of the original template if you ask me. Miijumaaru (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Did you actually read the sentence I wrote? I said "In creating the article 2026 BNP Paribas Open – Men's singles the key symbols for the seeded players is the same symbols used for defending points. The defending points has to be different symbols than the key." That's it. If you feel that is bashing then perhaps you are not suited for teamwork at Wikipedia. Most of your work is great but you have to be able to take an error being pointed out when you created the page with an error. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I usually look over thoroughly when making a page, but sometimes there’s that one slip and you bash me into the ground for it. Until whenever this warning expires, then I will leave this place until you stop taking your anger out on me. I will officially stop creating articles for the foreseeable future because I don’t want to constantly end up being on bad terms. Farewell. Miijumaaru (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- And there is now a record of your incivility with a warning. The page creation record shows you created the article with the error in it. You have to do your best to check these things when you create an article. I simply pointed out the error and I corrected it. This chip on your shoulder is going to create problems for you at Wikipedia so I'd check that at the door. The other thing you could have done is to ask the template creator of the legend to change their symbols. Either way would work. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on 2026 BNP Paribas Open – Women's singles. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I try to assume good faith but no, I have a severe problem with you particularly because it seems as if you clearly don’t like me. Always blaming me. Always the victim. I don’t get on with you because you’re too intimidating and you’re super, super bossy. Please leave me alone. Miijumaaru (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Drafts
Please note that drafts are not allowed to be filed in categories alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. Drafts must stay out of categories while they're in draft, and may be added to categories only if and when the page has been moved into articlespace.
The past couple of weeks, however, have been a constant parade of continually having to pull drafts that were created by you out of Category:2026 WTA Tour. So you need to stop filing drafts in categories, because drafts are never allowed to be in categories. And note that you have already been advised of this before, meaning that I'll be forced to report you to WP:ANI on grounds of disruption if it keeps happening any further. Thanks.
And also, do not respond by calling me a "bossy dictator" again, like you did last time. I am not the one who's being unreasonable here — you are, by refusing to listen to rules that have already been explained to you before. Bearcat (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Bossy!!!
Stop heavily berating me over missable mistakes. You know I still don’t like you. Miijumaaru (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2026 Mutua Madrid Open – Women's singles
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Mutua Madrid Open – Women's singles, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Errors can happen all the time…
It’s an error. I don’t need to cop heat over it. Miijumaaru (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)