User talk:Mohanooty

I would like to request that my block be reconsidered. I understand that using more than one account in a way that causes confusion or gives the impression of coordination is against Wikipedia policy. At the time, I did not fully understand that editing with two accounts on related topics could be considered sockpuppetry. There was no intention to mislead, manipulate discussions, or influence outcomes unfairly. I was simply editing and uploading content without realizing that this could violate policy. I now understand that even if there is no bad intent, using multiple accounts improperly is not acceptable. I am willing to: Use only one account going forward. Publicly declare any alternate account if required. Follow all policies related to conflict

Mohanooty (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I am asking for a second chance.

I did use two accounts, but I honestly did not know that editing related topics from both could be a serious issue. I was not trying to cheat or mislead. I understand now why it looks wrong.

I made a mistake. I should have taken the time to read the rules carefully. If u decide to unblock me I will make sure to use one account from now on. I will follow the rules, I will do my best to use my one account.

Thank you for your time.Mohanooty (talk) 06:53, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

They weren't "related topics", they were the same article. Also, what do you mean "do my best to use my one account"? A firm commitment to using one account from now on is required. PhilKnight (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I am asking for a last chance.

I did use two accounts, and I now understand that both were editing the same article. At that time, I honestly did not realize that this was a serious violation. I was not trying to cheat or mislead anyone. I understand now why it looks wrong and why it caused concern.

I made a mistake. I should have taken the time to carefully read and understand the rules before editing. That is my responsibility.

If you decide to unblock me, I will use only one account from now on. I will not create or use any other accounts. I will follow the rules properly and make sure this does not happen again.

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2026 (UTC)