User talk:MountainJew6150

Welcome to my talk page

MountainJew6150
Born	Michigan, United States
Family	No Children, 2 Parents, 4 Siblings

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clark Baldwin has been accepted

Clark Baldwin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 03:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Clark Baldwin moved to draftspace

This needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone and notability needs to be established with WP:RS. Not local stories and theories. It also needs to abide by WP:BLP and as he has not been convicted it also borders on a BLP violation. Attempting to "connect" the dots is WP:SYNTH unless reliable sources are also stating this. More importantly, using Wikipedia's voice to insinuate someone is a "murderer" or serial killer when there is no conviction is definitely a WP:BLPVIO. Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

June 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

We can't have an unsourced article about a potential murder / murderer. Do not create WP:BLP violating pages again or you will be blocked. —Kusma (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I understand that but I was going to cite sources in my second edit. At least give me a spit out of the article so I could take the extra 5 minutes to cite sources about this "potential" (100% convicted) murderer. Or better yet, you can even cite sources yourself. I spent the last hour working on this page and I find it incredibly ridiculous that I was given 60 seconds to cite a source. If I don't receive a spit out, then I'm either:A) Not gonna waste more time on it. B) Produce a page with a fraction of the effort.

I doubt either of us would like that. So with all the respect I can muster for you... please give me the spit-out -- MountainJew6150 (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully, when writing a page with this level of serious accusations, it is best to have the sources when creating the page, rather than to add them in a later edit. Also, it is your responsibility as the person making the claims to source them, not the responsibility of others to find them for you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I made a mistake. When I created Clark Baldwin's page 4 years ago, I was convinced the reason it was deleted was because Clark Baldwin was never convicted of his crimes. I did not know that claiming somebody committed a crime (that they were in-fact convicted of) without me doing my own research to prove it in the split seconds I needed it, was against some well-established rules. I only stopped editing to upload a photograph of Dylan Redwine and then I was gonna continue editing (which includes adding citations).

I would assume Wikipedia is not so negligent as to permanently delete drafts without addressing the issues to the creator first, so please , I would be very appreciative if Murder of Dylan Redwine could be reinstated as a draft page. I'm not super duper familiar with Wikipedia, but I am aware "drafts" are a thing and that would be much more in-line with Wikipedia's rules. Thank you for your time. - MountainJew6150 (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, you aren't supposed to do your research in the split seconds [you] needed it, you are supposed to do it before writing the page. That's, like, the basic Wikipedia:Verifiability concept.
Regarding what you wrote, I am sadly not able to reinstate it as a draft, although it is technically possible for administrators to do so. Also, while they don't have the same requirements as mainspace pages, drafts still have criteria regarding potentially libelous claims. Note that Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion does not provide articles considered attack pages, so I am not sure about that – although it could maybe work if you provide the sources needed to comply with WP:BLP. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Dylan Redwine.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dylan Redwine.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dylan Redwine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dylan Redwine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

"First U.S president to reach age 100"

I replied to your comment under the above topic at Talk:Jimmy Carter. Maurice Magnus (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024 (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

to pass WP:NLIST, the list group must be discussed as a group. mass shootings per country level usually are (depends on the country), but I have my doubts that mass stabbings do and there are no sources here to prove it or to even define the term. the list is two sentences unsourced. also we don't have mass shootings per year articles for the whole world for the same reason

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. --Yamla (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hi MountainJew6150! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Security incidents involving Donald Trump and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:29, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

I think I might have clicked "minor edit" by accident but thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. MountainJew6150 (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Just so you know, I undid your edit, as its main goal seems to have been to add material about these attempts having generated sympathy and votes for Trump... which may be true, but it is not stated, much less referenced, in the body of the article. The introduction is really there to sum up the things said below. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Somewhat. I was trying to illustrate that recent security incidents involving Trump seem to bring sympathy to his cause. I think that's somewhat important to the article. But my primary goal of the edit was to repurpose the mention of the Florida incident so that there is a valid reason to include it. It just looks weird being mentioned in the top when the only reason it even got significant media coverage compared to the Las Vegas incident was due to the timing of when it occurred. There have been numerous attempts on Trump's life, some that aren't even listed. I don't see why the Florida incident ever got the high-profile label it did besides for being only 2 months after a much more serious attempt.

But I agree that I probably should have reflected upon the content of the article before I decided to cram unsourced information into the lead. I accept blame for that mistake. I just don't believe the Florida incident deserves a mention in the lead. As the Las Vegas incident has shown: it's basically happened before. MountainJew6150 (talk) 02:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Suzanne Adams has been accepted

Murder of Suzanne Adams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 09:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024

Hello, MountainJew6150. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024 (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheInevitables (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, MountainJew6150! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheInevitables (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Christianity and homosexuality

Hey, I'm the one who added the recent images to the article Christianity and homosexuality... the former one was about an LGBT Christianity sign, so I thought it would be more neutral to have both sides' views on this (I was still having reservations and wasn't sure if they should have been kept however, and I was thinking that these would need more work). Sorry if it made it seem bad or "anti-Christian", I assure you, that wasn't my intention. Can I ask what lead images you think would be better? I'd be happy to work on that with you.

P.S. if you want examples of my other work, you can take a look at History of Catholic theology, an article which I created.

Wikieditor662 (talk) 04:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Also the lead was not written by me, but by someone else. Wikieditor662 (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

I apologize if you think I was making any specific allegations towards any one-person, or even you specifically. I didn't take any offense to the images. And to clarify, I didn't honestly think the images were "anti-Christian", I was mostly alluding to the first line which wasn't really focused on homosexuality specifically (such as taking note of Christianity's gray stance on slavery for most of its history). My actual reason for removing the images, and you are welcome to share a different view point, is because they don't seem to showcase the article's content. The article is not conservative Christians against secular progressives. The sign for example didn't seem to be aimed at literal "Christian fascists", but seemed to be throwing around a mean buzzard to attack the majority Christian politicians who were against gay marriage at that time. Now I am glad you understand that an image probably should go on there, but I don't think those two images work very well. The article seems mostly be about Christian views on homosexuality. To me, finding an image probably isn't going to be that easy because Christianity and homosexuality are both ancient, with Christianity originating in the first century and homosexuality being around since the earliest humans. Thus contemporary protests in the United States regarding gay marriage might not be a good fit, especially when gay marriage wasn't recognized by a single country in the world until 2001.

So my recommendation would be anything that conveys an idea an inner-faith debate regarding homosexuality. Maybe something like an LGBT flag with a crucifix on it? Or a crucifix next to an LGBT flag? After all, much of the page's content is about the history of Christian beliefs regarding homosexuality, not warring factions of homosexuals and conservative Christians. That's what those two images looked like to me.

Now I thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. If there's any ideas you may have, especially if they draw heavily on what I already suggested, I would just suggest being bold. It's not exactly up to me to decide what does and doesn't go in the article. I just don't think contemporary protests regarding gay marriage are a good fit. MountainJew6150 (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! I added the Christian Cross next to symbols of homosexuality to the lead, what do you think? And as for the former photos, do you think they could go anywhere else in the body? Wikieditor662 (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

I think the right image (pro-gay) has a better belonging on the Wikipedia page for Gay marriage in the United States or a similar page that has something to do with gay marriage in the US. Admittedly, I don't edit a lot in LGBT-related pages (not my area of interest) so it's not really something I care super much about. The left image (anti-gay) could maybe find a home somewhere in the article where relevant, as long as it pertains to contemporary history. It would be weird to include it somewhere alongside history of the twelve apostles. MountainJew6150 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Pronouns need to be included in the article to prevent confusion

Please start the thread on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies instead. There's more people there Trade (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Security incidents involving Donald Trump

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Security incidents involving Donald Trump, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024

Hello, MountainJew6150. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of mass stabbing incidents in 2024".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 27 June 2026 (UTC)