User talk:Rockfighterz M

MfD nomination of User:Rockfighterz M/sandbox

User:Rockfighterz M/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rockfighterz M/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rockfighterz M/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmos FK (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only a single independent coverage about a single event

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cosmos FK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 10:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Rockfighterz M! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 10:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmos FK (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your addition but still I didn't find significant coverage about the topic in reliable and independent references to the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cosmos FK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 01:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studenten has been accepted

Studenten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K.e.coffman (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mongraal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mongraal. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:28, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mongraal has been accepted

Mongraal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Great article! Very easy to understand as someone not well-learned in esports, but well in-depth too :) I have added a few catagories, but as I don't often edit in the area I suggest you add a few more. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:43, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I do really appreciate all the reviewers that are able to help polish articles by less experienced users like me. May I create a disambiguation page for 'Kyle Jackson'? The topic has no primary subject IMHO, although there is a Wikipedia Article titled 'Kyle Jackson'. Rockfighterz M (talk) 22:48, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

I don't really know much about the guidelines regarding disambiguation pages at all, though I expect it would depend how well Mongraal is actually known his full name. You can probably get advice at Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation or at the Teahouse/Help desk. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Your technical move request

Hello Rockfighterz M, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Rockfighterz M! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Collapsible column in table, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FNCS Season X logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FNCS Season X logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:FNCS Season X logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:FNCS Season X logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Pbrks ^(t·c) 19:16, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dellor (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still fails notability requirements. See its previous deletion for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dellor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:35, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean with "previous deletion"? Has the article been deleted before? If that's the case, I'd like to see the deletion discussion Rockfighterz M (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes it has, see its deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dellor. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Rockfighterz M! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Abbreviation explanation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025–26 Svenska Cupen has been accepted

2025–26 Svenska Cupen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605^talk 14:48, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Rockfighterz M! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help with infobox template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

Nomination for discussion of Template:Infobox esports duo

Template:Infobox esports duo has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:MrSavage

Hello, Rockfighterz M. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MrSavage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

WrestleMania 36 match images

If you want to give the reader an idea of what it was like to watch crowdless matches like the Night 2 main event, providing an additional image of what it was like to watch cinematic matches like the Night 1 main event would provide further visual insight into how the company was adapting to the limitations of the pandemic. AvatarUser (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

You're 100% correct, but that still doesn't justify the removal of the image portraying Night 2's main event. You should look for images of either of the two cinematic matches on Wikimedia Commons. Be bold and add what you can find! Rockfighterz M (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Upon re-evaluation, I agree and restored your image. AvatarUser (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Rockfighterz M! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Template turning number into rank, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

template:FNCS statistics usage in Mongraal article

Greetings!

I just wanted to ping you regarding your {{FNCS statistics}} template. I ran across it via the Mongraal article while working through Linter error lists earlier today. The template's use in the Mongraal article resulted in Linter flagging the article as a missing-end-tag syntax error due to how, as currently defined, {{FNCS statistics}} declares a new table without closing it.

To avoid generation of Linter errors going forward as editors use these templates, I think one of two things is needed:

the source code for {{FNCS statistics}} should be updated so the necessary |} table close tag is included.

the Usage section of the {{FNCS statistics}} template documentation should be updated to reflect a second {{BundleEnd}} to follow the {{FNCS statistics}}.

For the Mongraal article, I went ahead and added the extra {{BundleEnd}} to clear the syntax issue from the Linter report. If you opt to add the missing |} to the {{FNCS statistics}} source code, feel free to revert my edit (otherwise the extra table close tag will generate another Linter error)

Thanks and happy wiki'ing! SirOlgen (talk) 06:24, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Yep! That's correct. I'll go ahead and update the template code later today. Thanks a lot for the heads up; when I created the template, I do appreciate people taking the time to offer constructive feedback instead of just making the appropriate edit! Rockfighterz M (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Happy to help! — SirOlgen (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I have a question regarding this group of templates. The documentation suggests the use of {{BundleEnd}}, which puzzles me because none of the other templates from the {{Bundle}} group are used. Have you considered using the generic {{End}} instead? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Given that {{BundleEnd}} appeared to be closing-out a "bundle" of various types of FNCS templates, I hadn't given it a thought when I saw it last night, but yeah, from a standards standpoint it should probably be an {{End}}. Both appear to resolve to "|}" so should be interchangeable.

Or one could always create a clone of {{BundleEnd}} named {{FNCSEnd}}, which might be more intuitive for future editors given all the other Begin/End template pairings that exist.

Regards — SirOlgen (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I simply didn't know about {{End}} when making the templates @Redrose64. I've updated the documentations and will continue to use {{End}} from now on. On a side-note, I had taken inspiration from the {{PWtitlereign}} group of templates when making mine. That's where I got the {{BundleEnd}}, assuming it should be used in all groups of this kind. Rockfighterz M (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MrSavage

Hello, Rockfighterz M. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "MrSavage".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of List of highest-earning Fortnite players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of highest-earning Fortnite players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest-earning Fortnite players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 17:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Dellor (gamer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dellor (gamer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dellor (gamer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Fermiboson (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glossary of Fortnite terms

The article Glossary of Fortnite terms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The list is very clearly incomplete, as there are not a whole lot of entries past the letter D, and it is also a violation of WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. A decent amount of these are just regular video game terminology not very specific to Fortnite. As an alternative to deletion, I would also be OK with redirecting or merging this to Glossary of video game terms; some of the terms here such as "battle bus" may potentially be useful there.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

@Gommeh I was very surprised to find this page in mainspace, as it's clearly in the earlier stages of drafting, as apparent by the links leading to nowhere and so on. Thanks for pointing it out. I wasn't the one to move it, and would like it moved back to the draft namespace instead of being deleted. Is this possible? Rockfighterz M (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Sure. Moved. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 17:37, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate that! Am I correct that the redirect "Glossary of Fortnite terms" should be put up for speedy deletion? Rockfighterz M (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, because it is a cross-namespace redirect from mainspace to the draft space. Additionally, I still question the need for a Fortnite-specific glossary, especially when some of the terms you list in the draft already appear at Glossary of video game terms, so they wouldn't exactly be specific to Fortnite would they? Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 17:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Correct. I'll remove terms that aren't specific to Fortnite and re-evaluate the need for a standalone list before moving to mainspace. Rockfighterz M (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Clix (gamer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clix (gamer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clix (gamer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Unsigned comments

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clix (gamer), please be sure to sign your posts (but never when editing articles). There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 11WB (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clix (gamer), a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRG was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cosmos FK

Hello, Rockfighterz M. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cosmos FK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Robert Lewandowski

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Robert Lewandowski, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2026 (UTC)