User talk:SouthParkFan100

Welcome!

Hello, SouthParkFan100, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Knitsey (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate it! SouthParkFan100 (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @SouthParkFan100, I reverted your edit at Rinat Dasayev as IMDb is not a reliable source.

A few links that might help you...

WP:RS,

WP:RSL

WP:V

Self generated sources such as social medi, blogs, fansites etc are not generally used. There are exceptions to this (of course) such as blogs from the Microsoft team that have oversight, social media for a celebs birthday from their official account etc. These are generally used sparingly. Hope this helps! Happy editing, Knitsey (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

My bad! Rookie mistake! SouthParkFan100 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

It's not a problem. We all make mistakes, rookie or not lol. Knitsey (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SouthParkFan100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I was not trying to troll. I am very new here and I’m confused about the whole editing process. I deeply apologize May I please have another chance? SouthParkFan100 (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This user appears to either be trolling or behavior indistinguishable from. In the former case, the remedy is obvious. In the latter case, read up on Wikipedia policies and guidelines and wait six months before appealing. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:23, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SouthParkFan100 (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I wasn’t blocked a first time before being indefinitely blocked. I feel this is wrong. May I please have another chance? SouthParkFan100 (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Explain how this reverting a BLP violation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I thought it was. SouthParkFan100 (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I thought when an editor makes an edit to a living person, they’re supposed to cite it? SouthParkFan100 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

May I please be unblocked? SouthParkFan100 (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Unblock Request

SouthParkFan100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

It has been nearly a month and I apologize for making disruptive edits. I have since read all the guidelines, as I didn’t know where they were the last time. I’m extremely new here and was just trying to figure out how all this works. May I please have another chance? Thank you. SouthParkFan100 (talk) 01:57, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were told to wait six months. One month is five months short of six months. Don't make another request until 2026-01-29. At that point, you will need to demonstrate massively more WP:CIR than you have so far. Frankly, this unblock request will make it much harder for you to do so. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #105192

is declined, and I expect UTRS access will be revoked. WP:NONAZIS is directly on point here. We don't tolerate white supremacy here. --Yamla (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)