Your submission at Articles for creation: Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74 (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, SportsLover1967! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zulianos F.C. (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zulianos F.C. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:21, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74 (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide more reliable and independent references to the subject to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 AFL season. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 16:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

But it highlights who is eliminated + There is only July and August and then the playoffs begin. 94.197.64.40 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at 2016-17 AC1 FUTVE. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I forgot to remove it. 94.197.64.40 (talk) 06:43, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2016 and 2017 in South American baseball leagues

A tag has been placed on Category:2016 and 2017 in South American baseball leagues indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2017 in Venezuelan baseball

A tag has been placed on Category:2017 in Venezuelan baseball indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Quick questions

About Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 24#FC Urziceni: what is it that you are asking for as an outcome? If you search for FC Urziceni, then it redirects you to the FC Unirea Urziceni, so there isn't any content to merge. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

@Joseph2302 It must include the history of FC Urziceni, from WEBSITES. DuncanKeane05061967 (talk) 15:38, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

sorry. SportsLover1967 (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Istres FC. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Okay, Will never do it again. SportsLover1967 (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Potros de Barinas F.C.

Hello, SportsLover1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Potros de Barinas F.C., a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

I don’t need it as it got promoted to a Main Article by me. SportsLover1967 (talk) 19:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zulianos F.C.

Hello, SportsLover1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zulianos F.C., a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2016-17 AC1 FUTVE

Hello, SportsLover1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2016-17 AC1 FUTVE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zulianos F.C.

Hello, SportsLover1967. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zulianos F.C.".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Potros de Barinas F.C.

Hello, SportsLover1967. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Potros de Barinas F.C.".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74

Hello, SportsLover1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olympique Croix-de-Savoie 74, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Football

It's good to find another hater of big teams and fan of small teams Maroontruths (talk) 10:51, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I know. SportsLover1967 (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2026 (UTC)