User talk:UttarakhandWriterFan

Welcome

Hello, UttarakhandWriterFan!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia with 7,202,753 articles.

Getting Started

Tutorial

Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse

Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center

Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing!

هادية أنسو (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umesh Pant (March 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Pythoncoder, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Umesh Pant to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, UttarakhandWriterFan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umesh Pant (March 23)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, LEvalyn, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Typically, an author meets our criteria to have an article by having 2+ books with 2+ published, independent reviews each. The review of Door Durgam Durust in The Book Review looks good, but we need a second one like that to show that the book meets our book criteria, and then one of his other books also needs two reviews cited. Be careful to avoid interviews, book cover reviews, release events, etc, as only in-depth independent analysis of the book itself will "count". Additionally, all information in a biography of a living person must be cited, so all currently-uncited material either needs to have a source added or be removed.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Umesh Pant to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the clarification.

There are additional independent reviews of the author’s books in established Hindi publications such as Dainik Jagran, Amar Ujala, and Outlook Hindi. These include substantive book-focused reviews, though many are from print editions without online links.

As per Wikipedia guidelines, I can add them with full citation details and provide scans if needed. I’ll also ensure only qualifying reviews are included and address any uncited material.

Please let me know if this approach works.

Thank you. UttarakhandWriterFan (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

There's no need/way to provide scans, but if you add a citation with the full info about the print publication, that is OK. You'll have to do it as a "manual" citation; there's a little info on how to do so here. Sources in any language are fine. When you think the article is ready, resubmit the draft and another editor will take a look. ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 06:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)