November 2025
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
December 2025
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kakatiya dynasty have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kakatiya dynasty was changed by Venkateshpallapu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945734 on 2025-12-03T15:47:22+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Venkateshpallapu: You were blocked on November 11 to enforce an arbitration decision, as you do not have 500 edits (your account is over 30 days old so you do meet that portion of the criteria). I want to remind you again, you cannot edit articles related to the military history of Southeast Asia, including India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal, as well as articles about social groups based in these countries. This includes caste associations, such as Vaddera, where you have made several edits. Additionally, pretty much all of your edits have been unsourced, which has also been an issue brought up to you multiple times. You must stop editing in these areas until you meet both of the aforementioned criteria, and as I suggested before, you should also look at our guidelines on reliable sources and citing them, as if you continue editing the way you are, you likely could end up getting blocked again. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 16:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Minor Edits Checkbox
Hi Venkateshpallapu! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. MossOnALogTalk 15:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @MossOnALog ok thanks for inspiring I'll follow Venkateshpallapu (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
January 2026
Hello, I'm Throast. An edit that you recently made to Greenland seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 16:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- And, likewise, your edits to New England Revolution in international competition, Liam Rosenior, Cilia Flores, Lodian culture -- really, everything you've done so far this year is obviously chatbot generated. You should stop doing this immediately. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:14, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Throast Thanks for letting me know. I want to clarify that the edits were written by me and not copied from any source or automatically generated. That said, I understand that the content did not meet Wikipedia’s standards, especially regarding sourcing and original interpretation. I’ll stop adding this kind of material and will limit future edits to clearly cited summaries from reliable sources, using my sandbox first. I appreciate the feedback. Venkateshpallapu (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hamnet (film), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 05:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)