June 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Genk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Wunghuang. Thank you for your work on Diemert Defender. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
March 2025
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric talk 12:00, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
"Aerodynamic cavitation" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Aerodynamic cavitation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 8 § Aerodynamic cavitation until a consensus is reached. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:32, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flying car, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ZLEA TǀC 03:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
"Senbon" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Senbon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 17 § Senbon until a consensus is reached. consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 19:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
EFW N-20
I removed some information that you recently added to the above article because it was not cited to a reliable source. Someone's comment on Reddit is just not something we can rely on here. See also our policy on verifiability. Best, Ed [talk] [OMT] 22:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Removal of valid templates
Please do not remove valid templates in articles without fixing the problem for which the template was placed as you did for High-explosive incendiary. That article has been without references for its entire existence. You added no citations to any references when you removed the template. Another editor restored the template in later months. There are still to this date no citations to reliable sources in that article. This is not helpful to readers looking to Wikipedia for verifiable content. You may have changed your editing of other articles to no longer made such changes during the period since you made that edit. If so, thank you for doing so. However, since this article could be put up for deletion as it now stands (which is why I checked it), I thought it best to remind you not to remove templates without fixing related problems. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.