June 2023
Hello, I'm Evaders99. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Exo-CBX, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Evaders99 (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
DEADLINE6 가흠묘
Hi! I looked through your sandbox draft and it already feels quite complete overall. The structure is clear and easy to follow, and the content is organized in a very “Wikipedia” style. I especially like that the explanations are relatively neutral and not overly subjective, which makes the article read more naturally as an encyclopedia entry rather than a personal summary.
The references and formatting also seem carefully handled. There are only a few small things that could still be polished a bit, such as checking whether some internal links connect correctly and making a few sentences flow more smoothly. But overall, the draft already shows a lot of effort and attention to detail.
With a little more refinement, I think it could be ready for publication smoothly. Nice work, and keep going 👍 가흠묘 (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
DEADLINE6 LIN SHIHENG
Overall, I think this is an excellent article. It is well-structured, informative, and thought-provoking. The author explains the topic clearly and supports the main points with strong evidence and examples. The article not only increases readers' knowledge but also inspires them to think more deeply about the subject. I highly recommend it to others. LIN SHIHENG (talk) 02:24, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Feedback on your article
Hello,Wyyz02
I reviewed your article and noticed that many references contain only English titles. Since the article is written in Chinese, you may consider adding Chinese translations of the reference titles where appropriate. This would improve readability and make the citations more accessible to readers.
Overall, the article looks good. Thank you for your work! Kk778 (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Concern
Please review the comment at Talk:1988 Shanghai–Hangzhou railway collision and fix the issues. Then please review your other work and fix this error if it is elsewhere. I will be reviewing your work again tomorrow. This kind of error might indicate AI slop and may result in your work being rejected and grade adjusted if not fixed. Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here 05:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC)