User talk:Yodawriter

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAP-XX (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:
Submission seems to be partially WP:LLM Generated.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I do think this is a valuable entry into Wikipedia as it explains a key company in Australias electronics industry that has had a global presence for decades, as well as entanglements with large, well known companies like Tesla, Maxwells, Murata etc.
I have written the whole article and I am currently re-editing it to try and make it more neutral. I did think it was neutral personally. But could you guide me on what I could delete or words to change, to get this passed?
This is my first ever Wiki article and so I am not experienced at this sorry. Yodawriter (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yodawriter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAP-XX (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
and see WP:SOLUTIONS.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi Thero, the article I have just republished contains a large variety of sources including government, university, and industry published completely separate from CAP-XX so I am not sure why I keep getting this comment regarding sources. I think your comment on WP:Solutions was a clue that my words may be a problem? so I have deleted the words solution, global, growing, and strategy from the article. Yodawriter (talk) 12:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAP-XX (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAP-XX has been accepted

CAP-XX, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 21:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CAP-XX Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CAP-XX Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

White pride

While the article should be globalized, that doesn't mean that it should be watered down to be somehow "inoffensive." If "white pride" is being used in a positive sense outside the United States, please show sources supporting it, and discuss that on the article's talkpage to find consensus. first. Wikipedia isn't censored to spare peoples' feelings about racism. The sources you present are concerned with pride in nationality, not race, and don't mention "white pride" at all. Please see WP:SYNTH, we don't extend statements to generalities like that. Acroterion (talk) 20:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I understand, I did not water it down, the concepts covered in this article I found to be repetitive to articles such as the white supremacy article, and the ku klux klan article and so on.
Hence I have referred the reader to all those relevant articles that elaborate on white supremacy. And I have kept and made clear the association and use of white pride in such ways too and left in all those references.
I feel this new page is not watered down, but expanded to be specific that whiteness is largely an American concept whilst Europeans see it through a lens of our nationality. But Europeans identify as white as well and so there lies the confusion. Yodawriter (talk) 20:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEO Energy Metals (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All your sources are WP:ORGTRIV
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 17:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surface Transforms (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cinder painter (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hey, which sources are unreliable. They are reliable third party sources… Yodawriter (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:STCC-Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STCC-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surface Transforms (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CAP-XX Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CAP-XX Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:NEO Energy Metals

Information icon Hello, Yodawriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NEO Energy Metals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Surface Transforms

Information icon Hello, Yodawriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Surface Transforms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NEO Energy Metals

Hello, Yodawriter. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "NEO Energy Metals".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Surface Transforms

Hello, Yodawriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Surface Transforms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 30 November 2025 (UTC)