User talk:~2026-35622-93

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

June 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm TiredKitty. I noticed that you recently removed content from Procrastination without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I recognise that while you provided an explanation for the previous revert to the same article, some of the content reverted was cited, as was true for the revert of edits from the same contributor on the article Self-control which you stated were uncited and LLM generated and appear to have been cited and I observed no obvious signs of LLM usage, Please try to be more careful and do not be afraid to seek consensus when making significant edits such as these, kind regards TiredKitty 00:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@TiredKitty please see your talk page :) ~2026-35622-93 (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
apologies, my internet was having a bit of a moment; I'll take a look now
thank you for letting me know
kind regards, TiredKitty 00:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
This warning has been discussed at User talk:TiredKitty#about the reverted edits and retracted ~ TiredKitty (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edward James Saunderson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. The sources you removed do support the claims in the text DuncanHill (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ~2026-31498-07, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

Again, welcome! TiredKitty 11:10, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Apparent use of AI

Thank you for your message below . Could you please identify what recent edit you are referring to? The only reversion I find that you have made to a recent edit of mine was to the page Ballymena, and the reason you cited was not of any suspected AI content (which there is none--unless it is indirectly through what an AI search might throw up if it draws on a similar language or phrasing that I myself have used in contributions relating to the events of 1798 on other pages). The reason you gave was that one of claims made ( that in 1798, local rebels "quickly dispersed on news of the defeat of the larger rebel host at Antrim town" ) was not supported by the reference (ATQ Stewart) provided (which I will certainly check). So I am confused. Regards~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManfredHugh (talk • contribs) 16:03, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

User:ManfredHugh I apologise! My process whenever detecting if LLMs are used is to check and see if the sources say what they claim. This usually includes me checking the access-date= parameter, the pages= parameter, and checking if the URLs and such are good. 2 of your edits, one on on New Bedford seemed to have a dead URL, a bad access-date parameter, and a source which says one hundred thousand instead of ten thousands, the other on Ballymena seemed to have a pages= that was erroneous, because I checked the pages and the claim wasn't there. Finally, your edit on Edward James Saunderson, I skimmed the dictionary you cited very briefly, thought "none of the claims are there", and reverted it.
After seeing the edit on Edward James (that I thought was questionable), I checked your most recent edits, saw that they (to me) had the same sketchiness, and I thought "this person uses an LLMs". I should've picked a few random edits in your contributions, checked the sources, and it would've been extremely obvious that I was wrong. ~2026-35622-93 (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ~2026-35622-93. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ~2026-35622-93 (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello ~2026-35622-93! The thread you created at the Teahouse, my own talk page was edited by someone who incorrectly put their signature, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2026 (UTC)