Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Robichaud (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Daniel Robichaud

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity/autobiography. Non-notable businessman, no sigcov to establish notability. Article was deleted in 2016 but recreated, in the editor's words, "with Daniel Robichaud himself". Jdcooper (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

* Delete Minor serial player, but nothing major. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment: actually, while the article in its current form does date to January 2016 (and has been tagged as a potential NBIO failure, undersourced, reliant on primary sources when there are sources, and being an autobiography since then), the first nomination and resulting deletion was all the way back in 2006. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:51, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete - autobiographies are disfavored because they almost always have original content, which we have never published, and more so now because it feeds our critics who will use these as an excuse to eliminate the WMF's charitable status. Bearian (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.