Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Day New York (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK # 1 and 2c. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Good Day New York

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nearly four years after it's last AfD (admittedly by me as well), the article is still poorly sourced, a haven for OR, and still has little claim to notability outside NYC. The "Google Test" returned over 300k results, but most are either from WNYW, or short articles on sites like Gawker covering viral clips of the newscast. True CRaysball | ^#RaysUp 09:49, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 15:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 15:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep. The program has received in-depth coverage from reliable sources: Pburka (talk) 18:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Not one of those help source what is already in the article. True CRaysball | ^#RaysUp 18:56, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

We're engaged in a discussion regarding notability of the topic. If you wish to improve the article, you can do so without involving WP:AFD. Pburka (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Never said we weren't, rather I meant to say that those didn't establish notability globally or nationwide. True CRaysball | ^#RaysUp 20:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

There's no requirement that notability be global or nationwide. That's not consistent with WP:GNG, WP:NOT, nor any other policy I'm familiar with. It also contradicts the well known essays WP:LOCAL and WP:LOCALFAME. Pburka (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.