- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:07, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Robin Raven
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robin Raven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From a search, I see bylines in multiple publications, but I don't see any significant coverage that would meet WP:GNG. I don't see books or writing that would fit in WP:AUTHOR/WP:NJOURNALIST. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 21:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Journalism. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 21:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Travel and tourism. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: there are the faintest indications that this is the same subject as one whose article was deleted in the first nomination from 2007, but very, very little material in the current article overlaps at all with anything that could possibly have been in that iteration. (No opinion on the current article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Alabama and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Weak keep.' I have rewritten the article conservatively to remove weaker event/promo material and focus on published works and reception. I agree that many available sources are primary or only verify basic facts, but the subject has multiple commercially published books and at least one solid independent professional review, from Library Journal, with additional weaker review-style coverage for another book.
This may not be the strongest author article, but the current version is no longer just a collection of bylines or publisher bios. Given the independent book-review coverage and the possibility of further reviews in library/book-review databases, I think deletion is premature. --☆☆☆ interstellarpoliceman ☆☆☆ 23:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)- Striking off input by contributor blocked for sockpuppetry.
- Delete - I added the notability tag. Doesn’t fulfil WP:NAUTHOR which requires at least two books with at least two proper reviews each. She only has one review of one book. The page creator agrees, see their comment here: User_talk:TaskManager#h-Ways_to_improve_Robin_Raven-20260502193200. Lijil (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- Delete due to subject's lack of independent notability. Fails WP:GNG; cannot be rescued by WP:NAUTHOR. -The Gnome (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.