Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staffan Ulmert

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was keep. BD2412 T 01:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Staffan Ulmert

Staffan Ulmert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to demonstrate notability. There is no significant coverage of Staffan Ulmert (aka Mojib) in reliable, independent secondary sources as required by Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (WP:GNG). Most of the references are either primary, trivial mentions, or routine coverage of projects he was involved in, rather than in-depth profiles or critical discussion. The bulk of the content relies on passing mentions in music blogs, promotional materials, or self-published sources. Everett Millais (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Sweden. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:32, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Leaning Keep. His music has garnered critical attention in at least four reliable sources: , , , and Gale A250015524. On top of that he's started what appears to be a notable website and he is something of a subject matter expert per articles in Vice, New York Times and Globe and Mail, articles which include some bylined biographical information which on top of the critical reviews is about sufficient to build an article. ResonantDistortion 15:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Keep - the multiple independent reviews of his music fulfils criteria 1 on WP:MUSICBIO Taking the reviews at face value there may be other criteria that could apply. ChrysGalley (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Keep Per ChrysGalley. The independent reviews of his work meet the 1st criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. GothicGolem29 01:20, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.