- David L. Jones (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
Discussion was flawed, did not focus on WP guidelines e.g lack of secondary sources, lack of notability etc. Subsequent discussion on talk page has addressed these issues, concluded that article should be deleted. Most of the information on which the original decision was based has been removed from the article now. ゼーロ (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- RELIST or OVERTURN. The article is just a stub, most of the references have been removed because they are primary or of extremely low quality. Most importantly, despite much discussion nothing has been offered to establish notability. The almost complete lack of secondary sources and inability to improve the article cannot be ignored. ゼーロ (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Given that the AfD is from May and ended in No Consensus I'd suggest just starting a new AfD (which you don't need to come here for). The arguments for keeping it do look rather weak to me. Hut 8.5 18:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Procedural endorse, being that this was closed as no consensus in May. That being said, I have no complaints about a new AfD being started. Kharkiv07 (T) 01:57, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- If one of you guys wants to close this appeal and start a new AfD, I'd support that. That's actually what I was trying to do, but got redirected to the old discussion and couldn't figure out how to do anything other than appeal >_< ゼーロ (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- WP:AFDHOWTO explains the method. Note in particular the part of the instruction marked "If the article has been nominated before..." Stifle (talk) 09:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Can we have a valid link to the AFD please? The one in the header is malformed. Stifle (talk) 09:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- I tried to sort it out. If it's still wrong please just correct it. ゼーロ (talk) 10:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
|