Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 June 28

28 June 2025

Westlake, Washington – Relisted to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 8#Westlake, Washington. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Westlake, Washington (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) Westlake is a former incorporated settlement and now has a paragraph in the Moses Lake article. Most uses of the term still refer to the former town rather than the Seattle neighborhood. Sounder Bruce 04:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Relist given the limited discussion, for you to make that argument. SportingFlyer T·C 09:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC) [Closer's notes] The outcome was a Retarget. I closed on 27th, and mention was added at the redirect's previous target article on 28th. Appellant didn't discuss with me regarding the close. Jay 💬 09:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC) My apologies. I was directed here when I asked for some advice on how to undo the decision (as I did not have time to respond to the discussion due to an extremely busy week). Next time I will just contact the closer directly. Sounder Bruce 18:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Relist. There was limited discussion and not a quorum to do anything. The nom statement that there is No mention in article [Moses Lake, Washington] has been addressed with the addition of sourced content. A relist would allow this content to be evaluated. Frank Anchor 11:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC) No action. This could have been resolved with the appellant directly contacting the closing admin, who is responsive and receptive to such requests. While this isn't strictly required by policy, I see no reason to waste the community's time on something that could have been settled within minutes between the two of them. I doubt relisting would achieve a clearer consensus than what we have, but Jay is welcome to relist and administratively close this DRV as moot. Owen× ☎ 12:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Relist I am convinced that a relist is appropriate in this situation. I don't think the close was wrong, but per deletion review point 3, new information has come to light, that should be evaluated by the community. --Enos733 (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Comment - There is something wrong with the listing of the RFD log. When I view the RFD log for June 18, I see Westlake as the last entry in the Table of Contents, but I don't see it when I view the log. I do see it when I edit the source for the log, and it isn't obvious to me what has made it invisible, and I don't have time for a few hours to search for the misplaced commands and fix it. I think that the listing should be corrected regardless of the outcome of this DRV. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC) I don't think that the problem is with this RFD log, because I am also seeing MFD listings disappear. I will be inquiring at the Help Desk. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Endorse as the correct outcome; the Westlake neighborhood in Seattle would be the PRIMARYTOPIC no matter how you slice it. Jclemens (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Westlake, Washington – Relisted to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 8#Westlake, Washington. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Westlake is a former incorporated settlement and now has a paragraph in the Moses Lake article. Most uses of the term still refer to the former town rather than the Seattle neighborhood. Sounder Bruce 04:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Relist given the limited discussion, for you to make that argument. SportingFlyer T·C 09:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
[Closer's notes] The outcome was a Retarget. I closed on 27th, and mention was added at the redirect's previous target article on 28th. Appellant didn't discuss with me regarding the close. Jay 💬 09:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- My apologies. I was directed here when I asked for some advice on how to undo the decision (as I did not have time to respond to the discussion due to an extremely busy week). Next time I will just contact the closer directly. Sounder Bruce 18:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Relist. There was limited discussion and not a quorum to do anything. The nom statement that there is No mention in article [Moses Lake, Washington] has been addressed with the addition of sourced content. A relist would allow this content to be evaluated. Frank Anchor 11:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
No action. This could have been resolved with the appellant directly contacting the closing admin, who is responsive and receptive to such requests. While this isn't strictly required by policy, I see no reason to waste the community's time on something that could have been settled within minutes between the two of them. I doubt relisting would achieve a clearer consensus than what we have, but Jay is welcome to relist and administratively close this DRV as moot. Owen× ☎ 12:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Relist I am convinced that a relist is appropriate in this situation. I don't think the close was wrong, but per deletion review point 3, new information has come to light, that should be evaluated by the community. --Enos733 (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - There is something wrong with the listing of the RFD log. When I view the RFD log for June 18, I see Westlake as the last entry in the Table of Contents, but I don't see it when I view the log. I do see it when I edit the source for the log, and it isn't obvious to me what has made it invisible, and I don't have time for a few hours to search for the misplaced commands and fix it. I think that the listing should be corrected regardless of the outcome of this DRV. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think that the problem is with this RFD log, because I am also seeing MFD listings disappear. I will be inquiring at the Help Desk. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Endorse as the correct outcome; the Westlake neighborhood in Seattle would be the PRIMARYTOPIC no matter how you slice it. Jclemens (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.