Wikipedia:PRWAITING

Can We Hang Out Sometime?

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like feedback on its structure, sourcing, and clarity to identify any issues before nominating it for Good Article.

Thanks, Monkegamer123 (talk) 02:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Space Invaders Infinity Gene

I've listed this article for peer review because I think it has FA potential. I'm focusing on the quality of the prose but am open to feedback on all aspects to ensure the article has a good chance at FAC. Thanks, (Guyinblack25 ^talk 02:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC))

Sodium-cooled fast reactor

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to make this a GA. Any feedback is welcome, and I would especially appreciate feedback from non-technical readers to ensure it complies with WP:TECHNICAL and WP:SUMMARY.

Thanks, H2so4aq (talk) 05:17, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Palestine at the 1996 Summer Olympics

Previous peer review

Doing another peer review for this article as I've added quite a big amount of text and would possibly nominate it as an FAC. Quite contentious as well considering the topic so neutrality might be an issue. Shall respond to comments as soon as I can. Arconning (talk) 14:01, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Wanli Emperor

I am listing this article for peer review to identify any significant issues before nominating it for FA status. Any constructive comments, suggestions, or feedback on the article's content, structure, sourcing, prose, or compliance with FA criteria would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Min968 (talk) 14:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Columbine High School massacre

Previous peer review

I'm listing this article for peer review because I am looking to take it to GA status in the somewhat near future. I'm seeking to work out any major issues prior to that, and also make sure the article has GA potential to begin with. I've been slowly working on it over the past couple months, chopping any grammatical errors and original research, but at the same time would like some advice on how to improve it more. It's a very in depth article, and takes more than one set of eyes to find any issues.

Thank you. Gavetheman555 (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Athanasius I Manasses

The article concerns a senior Byzantine cleric whose life is poorly documented, but who became the first Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch able to reside in the city in the 12th-century. I have listed it for peer review because I am considering nominating it for FA status, and would be grateful for suggestions on how to improve its prose and comprehensiveness. Thanks, Borsoka (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Xerothamnella parvifolia

I've listed this article for peer review because... i recently expanded article Xerothamnella parvifoliaand would appreciated feedback on it structure, sourcing and general review.

Thanks, KIVYD (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Poecilia velifera

I would be grateful for a peer review of this article. I have been fussing over it for months and almost know it by heart, so I need fresh eyes before taking it to FAC. I am looking forward to your comments. Surtsicna (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Diademed sifaka

I have listed this article for peer review because I have substantially revamped it, and I would like to have input and assistance from others to ensure that it meets the standards that are expected for species articles, as this is my first time working on one.

Prior to editing the article, hardly anything was cited and much of the writing was left over from when it was created in 2006. This needed addressing; for example, there is 20 years of incorrect information across many different websites that resulted from this article mistakenly assigning the name "ankomba joby" to the diademed sifaka, even though it refers to a different species. My initial goal was to find citations for the sentences that were already present. This turned into re-wording many of them to maintain an encyclopedic tone, and finally I began to add more content based on research articles I had found while in the process of finding sources. This has resulted in an article that is quite different from how it was when I found it.

Thanks, Babacoote (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

The Pittsburgh Cycle

I haven't listed anything for peer review, but I think that this might be a good candidate for FA at some point in the future and thought it might be a good place to help me calibrate improvements to the page. Besides not having put anything for peer review, I've also not put anything for FA before, so feel free to disabuse me of any incorrect notions there. Any constructive criticism is thoroughly appreciated!

Thanks, Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 23:01, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Jorge Salvaire

I've done a lot of work on this article since creating it and I would like to know if this article is ready for a GAN. I have never done anything on this level before so I would appreciate some feedback on whether it stands a chance at a potential review.

Thanks! Lynch44 22:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Premise

I've listed this article for peer review to prepare it for a featured article candidacy. I would be interested to learn what changes are required to fulfill the featured article criteria, but I'm also open to more casual improvement ideas.

Thanks, Phlsph7 (talk) 09:48, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

2021 Pennsylvania Amendment 3

In 2021, Pennsylvania voters passed a referendum to amend the state constitution to prohibit racial and ethnic discrimination. The change followed the death of George Floyd.

I wish to bring this article to featured status and would like to see what suggestions there are to improve it.

Thanks, Delcoan (talk) 03:39, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Matt Gaetz

I've listed this article for peer review because I would appreciate guidance on improvements to the article quality prior to a nomination for GA.

Thanks, TarnishedPath^talk 00:04, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Kai Newkirk

I've listed this article for peer review because I just created it a couple of months ago and then I disappeared while it was deleted via PROD. This week I am working on making it B+ if possible. So I thought I would ask for peer review. Any thoughts or suggestions, even casual ones, would be appreciated. No ongoing edit wars or anything.

Thanks, Tom Haws (talk) 23:48, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Timeline of 1980s political violence and sabotage acts in Bulgaria

I would like to take this list to FLC and would like to prepare for it.

Thanks, Pietrus1 (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)