Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

• DJVI → Geometry Dash#Music  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Unrelated uses exist at German trawler V 206 Otto Bröhan for a ship callsign and at DjVu for an element of the file format. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Time for a history dive! The section that contained references to DJ-Nate and DJVI is NOT the Music section that currently exists; these redirects were created to reference a Music section that was deleted in July of 2023 for being completely uncited. The current Music section was added in April of this year, and as noted does not contain reference to either artist.

Prior to all of that, though, the DJVI redirect had two stints of being an attempt at an article; the first time was a short unformatted paragraph, the second time was as a fully formatted article. Unfortunately, neither had sources and they were then reverted back to the redirect-- the latter fully-formatted but unsourced version after a mere 30 minutes. If you guys wanna restore this version, go right ahead. (No prejudice to sending it directly to AfD, of course.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:09, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Huh. I went to notify the users who made the DJVI article and who reverted it respectively; the latter is a WP:dead Wikipedian and the former is... someone who doesn't have a user page or talk page (somehow???) and whose only footprint on Wikipedia at all ever-- no block, no other edits, nothing-- was making this article that got reverted by someone else within 30 minutes. What. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 06:39, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

@Lunamann, do you prefer restoring or just don't oppose, I'm confused by your wording here. Rusalkii (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

I would prefer to restore the article, sorry I didn't make that clear. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as related content was reverted. The BLARd unsourced (except for social media handles) bio needn't be kept. If user Iemand990 requests the content back later, an admin can provide it. Although the term is unambiguous on enwiki for the German trawler, I don't think it is useful as a redirect. Jay 💬 08:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 23:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per Jay. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:26, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 15:34, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

• 2026 NASCAR Cup Series → NASCAR Cup Series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page can probably be made soon but WP:RFD#DELETE 10, not mentioned at target Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 20:42, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Just realized this was nominated before, closed as delete last year. Would it be eligible for speedy? Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 20:42, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

it sounded very TOOSOON to me, and sure enough, when i looked at the page history, it was draftified for that Oreocooke (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per the previous RfD which I have listed here. While moving a new article to draft, we usually move without leaving a redirect, but Glman doesn't have the WP:Page movers right, probably why he redirected it to an available target. Jay 💬 05:51, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

• Trevor J. Bredenkamp → United States Army Military District of Washington#List of commanders  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Respectfully opening a deletion discussion on this redirect. For a time, Major General Bredenkamp commanded the unit which the target article refers to, but that is no longer the case; he relinquished command on July 21, 2025. As MG Bredenkamp is not personally or notably identified with this unit beyond ordinary personnel assignments, the redirect could prove confusing for others. He has since assumed command of the U.S. Army War College. SuperWIKI (talk) 16:11, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and per criterion 10 - "the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." There are already several redlinked officers on the current target page, including the current office-holder; this treatment is also appropriate for Bredenkamp. Tevildo (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Somnophilia. No agreement on adding a hatnote to Zolpidem, but anyone is free to add one if desired. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:32, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

• SomnoSomno → Zolpidem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Somno" is unmentioned at this target. "somno-" appears to be a prefix meaning "sleep", but when someone says "somno" and only "somno" (without a -), you're no longer dealing with a prefix User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:48, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Weak keep. "Somno" is brand of zolpidem made by Saval Pharmceuticals, a Chilean firm . It might be worth mentioning at the target. Tevildo (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. I created the redirection when I lived in Chile and bought medicine by this name. There is a section called "Brand names" in the article but it is empty. Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

  The main problem is that most of the people searching up "somno" (like me) were expecting to be redirected to somnophilia as "somno" is a bdsm shortening User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  That is fine with me. Maybe put a Redirect-template at the top of the Somnophilia article to reference the Chilean drug. Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson (talk) 14:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to somnophilia per Someone-123. Tevildo (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

• Resident Evil (2020 film) → Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As per the move log, it is a typo. There were no films released that year. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Gulf of Mexico naming controversy. Rusalkii (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

• Gulf of americaGulf of america → Gulf of Mexico#Name  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Gulf of AmericaGulf of America → Gulf of Mexico#Name  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per an RfD back in January this redirects to Gulf of Mexico#Name, however since then a new article has been created, Gulf of Mexico naming controversy, which would be a much more appropriate target for these redirects. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom, a full article on the topic would be a better target. BugGhost 🦗👻 08:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget per nom. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:26, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
• Tagged redirects since they weren't tagged by the nom. @Sangjiinhwa: please do not forget to add the RfD tag when nominating a redirect. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:11, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

  I could not tag Gulf of America as it was fully protected. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 01:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to the naming dispute. Slatersteven (talk) 08:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget as per nom; proposed target is an extensive look into this alternate name for the Gulf of Mexico. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

• 씨 → Hangul  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible foreign language redirect WP:PLA one typing in a Korean title is probably not looking for information on 한글 which already redirects to Hangul. Aasim (話す（はなす）) 00:49, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. 씨 purportedly means "a seed"; whether or not this machine translation is accurate, it does not mean Hangul. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:26, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Hangul is an unlikely intended target and there's no clear appropriate alternative target. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).