Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Denmark

Clara Rosager

Clara Rosager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potential non notable person. Added text: I think current sources and the ones out there don't meet the significant notability criteria. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related AfD discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Fashion. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Found a source:

https://elle.dk/agenda/identitet/skuespiller-clara-rosager-om-sildemadderne-pizzaen-og-pastaen-der-har-formet/

It isn’t primary though. Do with that what you will.

Also found this:

https://www.voguescandinavia.com/articles/clara-rosager-danish-actor-interview, which is both reliable and secondary. Keep. _{In solidarity} Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 20:08, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

https://elle.dk/agenda/identitet/skuespiller-clara-rosager-om-sildemadderne-pizzaen-og-pastaen-der-har-formet/ looks to be an interview of the model. And the second is another interview. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

What does "potential non notable person" mean? You didn't check? No BEFORE, no AfD. Obvious WP:NACTRESS pass. Her role in Supergirl is significant. Her role in The Rain (TV series) too. Her role in the The Kiss (2022 film) too. In Those Who Kill (2019 TV series), too. In Before the Frost, too. See reviews of the productions (one example at random: https://loudandclearreviews.com/the-kiss-kysset-film-review/) and coverage such as https://www.voguescandinavia.com/articles/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-up-and-coming-danish-actor-clara-rosager https://tvovermind.com/clara-rosager/ Keep. ~2026-35976-24 (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Why did you even initiate an AfD on her????@Tyw7 ~2026-35976-24 (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

https://loudandclearreviews.com/the-kiss-kysset-film-review/ is a review about the film.

https://www.voguescandinavia.com/articles/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-up-and-coming-danish-actor-clara-rosager seem to be a first person article ie promo. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:55, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks but

1) "is a review about the film." Yes. It's explicitly indicated in my !vote : "see reviews of the productions " -> Read all the reviews of the films she has a role in and you will check that she has significant roles in multiple notable. Ergo WP:NACTRESS pass.

2) "a first person article" What does that mean? That the journalist says "I"? Hmmm? Okay. She does not (she says We, once) but what would the issue be? The article is bylined: Eleanor Kittle If you don't like it, don't use it. Not sure why it should be considered promo. Do you mean based on excerpts from interviews? Maybe. Still, it's a secondary source. If you don't like, again, don't use. It's not needed.

3) Please do a BEFORE next time and explain on what grounds precisely you think a subject is not notable. Rosager is clearly a notable actress. You changed your rationale since we !voted. You should have made that clear per WP:REDACT. Now my !vote seems unfair to you while at the time it was very justified. Please amend that by indicating what and when you added things.

4) as for your recently added " I think current sources don't meet the significant notability criteria", it's confusing, especially if you pipe the link to WP:SNG (which she meets!!!!) : significant coverage is one thing; notability is another thing. Do you mean "WP:GNG because of lack of significant coverage"? Familiarise yourself with the jargon and procedures, please. ~2026-35976-24 (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Why are you editing from an IP address? You seem to have vast interest to keeping the article around.

And significant roles? The show maybe significant, but she doesn't. That said I looked at Google news and I found articles about the movie / series she stars in, but not about her on her own. That said I did find 2 focus pieces

• https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/scandi-actress-clara-rosager-play-141429137.html
• https://www.voguescandinavia.com/articles/clara-rosager-danish-actor-interview

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

"Why are you editing from an IP address?" Not from an IP address, with a temporary account. It's slightly different (technically anyone is editing online websites "from an IP address";D) Why not? Since when is that an issue? Why are you editing through a registered account? Since when is it mandatory? "You seem to have vast interest to keeping the article around." Sure, and for a good reason: I think she's notable. Thank you for the new source (the second one was the same one you had discarded earlier, but no worries). Of course her roles in the notable productions mentioned above are significant. Again, read the reviews or watch the films/series and you'll probably admit it. Have a look at the posters of two of her films. Before the Frost and Kiss. Can't you see her? Her name?

If you (have?) change(d) your mind, feel free to WITHDRAW this nomination.

Also, you have again changed your rationale since my last reply without making the timeline of your changes clear and my previous comment about the link to SNG that was (but is not anymore, now your link goes to SIGCOV) present in your statement is now confusing....In these conditions, I won't reply here anymore, it's too tedious. There's a good deal of coverage in Danish (some based on interviews), if you wish. Good luck. There's no way she cannot be considered notable and if the English Wikipedia does not consider her notable, then...well...too bad for the English Wikipedia. ~2026-35976-24 (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Keep meets WP:NACTOR. In both En to tre nu and The Kiss she plays one of the two starring roles. Her parts in The Rain and 1899 are also significant, featured in main credits. I added some sources to the article. Zzz plant (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, seems like a super obvious choice to me - more than sufficient sourcing for an article. Needs to be expanded, though. Jishara (talk) 06:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Princess Marie Louise of Schaumburg-Lippe

Princess Marie Louise of Schaumburg-Lippe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The significance of the article is not shown. This article contains only genealogical information. Wikipedia is not a database of aristocrats. RobertVikman (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark, Royalty and nobility, and Women. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:22, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - See Featured list Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark. Scroll down to Children of Frederick VIII, King of Denmark. It is not unusual to have a secondary article with information that connects lists or information in the Featured list. — Maile (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

  Just because she is a descendant of King Frederick VIII of Denmark does not make her significant. Significance is not inherited. Therefore your argument is invalid. RobertVikman (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. There's not much in this article except genealogical details. And of the five sources cited, one of them, a New York Times article about her son's marriage in 1961, doesn't even mention the subject's name. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Prince Friedrich Sigismund of Prussia (1891–1927) where all the sourced info from her page is already mentioned. Coverage seems to be purely genealogical. I don't know what being on a FL has to do with retaining this page... JoelleJay (talk) 08:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Prince Friedrich Sigismund of Prussia (1891–1927) or delete. All the citations listed are directory entries, which do not meet the requirements of the notability guideline. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Prince Friedrich Sigismund of Prussia (1891–1927). The sourced content about her birth, marriage, children and death is already present in that article. She held no office, performed no public role that generated independent coverage, and the sources cited are genealogical directories and not independent reliable sources under WP:GNG. MissBVCC (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Prince Friedrich Sigismund of Prussia (1891–1927), relevant info about her can be found there without having an entire article. OliviaRigby (talk) 05:14, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect per JoelleJay("She held no office, performed no public role that generated independent coverage...."). Compare "Spouses and minor children of deposed royalty could be notable, because their businesses, charity work, attendance at relatives' notable weddings, or a notable scandal often provides them with media attention," from user:Bearian/Standards#Notability of Consorts of nobility. Since it appears she never engaged in public philanthropy, nor a torrid affair, nor did she live long enough to be a matchmaker or godmother to her dozens of notable cousins, she's probably not notable. The only major positive purposes of an aristocracy in a modern society are gossip and charity. As usual, ping me if you find more. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Others