User talk:Alexandereden

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Hello. There are several statements, mostly in the Early life, Chicago and regional work, Broadway and New York productions, Writing and criticism, Philanthropy and library donation, and Legacy sections. Before resubmission, find more reliable sources to verify the information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alexandereden! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Alexandereden! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Alexandereden. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sidney Eden, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. To be clear, you can still edit the draft, you just have to disclose your conflict of interest. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Hughie Review Chicago 1974.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hughie Review Chicago 1974.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hughie Review Chicago 1974.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hughie Review Chicago 1974.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Drafts and images

Hey there, welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you're working on Draft:Sidney Eden. Please let me know if you need any assistance once the draft has been more developed. In the meantime, I wanted to explain that non-free images are not allowed in drafts, which is why the bot keeps removing them. Please do not continue uploading images. I wanted to let you know that I previously updated the rationale of File:Hughie Broadway Poster 1975.jpg, which you uploaded on November 19, and put it into use at Hughie, which means it will not be deleted. When your draft is moved to main space as Sidney Eden, you can use this image again by adding a rationale specific to this biographical article. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 16:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear TAnthony,
Thank you very much for the feedback. I am a media major from Hunter College, specializing in mainly film, and only want to honor my father. He recently passed and it hurts to know that he has not been honored properly. Thanks again, Scotty. Alexandereden (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 13:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pro-anti-air was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
2nd reference gives a 404 error for me.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 18:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pro-anti-air was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Don't remove AfC templates. The 2nd source still doesn't work, and the rest are about Hughie, rather than establishing notability of Sidney Eden.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 16:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 02:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney Eden (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 08:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sidney Eden

Information icon Hello, Alexandereden. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sidney Eden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sidney Eden

Hello, Alexandereden. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sidney Eden".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:28, 21 June 2026 (UTC)