It wasn't initially clear to me what you were trying to do, but I think I understand now given your explanation at RfD and this edit. Because there is no existing page for Georgina Willis, would recommend first drafting a high-quality one, then tackling the question of the redirect. Please review WP:YFA and strongly consider going through WP:AFC as a paid editor with apparently little experience editing Wikipedia. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 16:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
It doesn't make sense to redirect "Georgina Willis" to "Georgia Willis Read". Georgina and Georgia are two different names. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Please can i use my other account for the edits as this is too complex for me Creative Contents (talk) 17:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
What is your other account? GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Seems I might have to create a new account, I cannot seem to access the other account Creative Contents (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
What was the name of the other account? Was it Pradorz? GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Not that but something with The beloved Creative Contents (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Okay, well please be aware of our policy on multiple accounts. There is no need for you to create a new account; this one works perfectly well. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm also avoiding that. So please what do you suggest I do for the changes? Creative Contents (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
If your goal is to create a biographical article for Georgina Willis, you can follow the instructions at WP:AFC. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, thanks for your precious time Creative Contents (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Please I have a new question which you might be able to have answers too, does "Georgina Willis" ever existed on wiki so as to know what to inform my client Creative Contents (talk) 18:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Yes, there was a very brief article about her in May, which was replaced with a redirect because it did not demonstrate she meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 18:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks GorillaWarfare, My confusion now has an answer now, really appreciate Creative Contents (talk) 18:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
I requested for the Georgina willis page be restored. I haven't yet gotten a feedback. I want to make improvements to the page to meet wikis notability standard. please kindly help
I have moved the old revisions of the page to Draft:Georgina Willis, where you can work on bringing it up to Wikipedia standards and request review once you think it's ready. Before you begin, you also need to more adequately disclose the circumstances of your paid editing, per WP:PAID, which requires you explicitly disclose your "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any paid contribution to Wikipedia". You can do this by adding this template to your user page: {{paid|employer=Name of your employer|client=Name of your client, if different from your employer}}, replacing the fields with the required details. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 15:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
so, can i go on making the edits now? Creative Contents (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Yep, go for it. Thanks for updating the disclosure. I'd recommend reading WP:YFA so you understand what's required for new pages. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 17:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! I have submitted for review., Hope it gets accepted Creative Contents (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Creative Contents!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
what area are you specifically reffering to? Creative Contents (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
so now has the article been rejected again Creative Contents (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
I had not reviewed again as I saw you ask this, but yes it will probably be declined again unless the someone else adds more sources. I did have a quick look but the only 'news' source I found was on a blacklisted site. KylieTastic (talk) 19:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
which news source, Is it ABC you're referring to? Creative Contents (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
No I found one on "London Post" called "Georgina Willis creates a floating film Studio to Film Insect O Cide" then found it was blacklisted. KylieTastic (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Seriously, this is getting too much please, what area needs improvement now? Creative Contents (talk) 00:09, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Why hasn't my new submission been reviewed yet? Please help out of this situation. Creative Contents (talk) 18:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
From the template: "Review waiting, please be patient. This may take a week or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 192 pending submissions waiting for review."
However, I should note that continuing to re-submit a draft that has been declined for lack of sources demonstrating the subject's notability, without adding any such sources, is not particularly likely to be successful, and is a drain on reviewer time. GorillaWarfare(she/her•talk) 19:55, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by MediaKyle was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Please what areas needs improvement this time around? Creative Contents (talk) 23:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
Hello Creative Contents. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Stiven Mikhail, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Creative Contents. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Creative Contents|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 23:09, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
== Response to paid editing concerns ==
Hello Bilby,
Thank you for your message about my edits to the Draft:Stiven Mikhail article.
I would like to disclose that I am a paid editor and receive compensation for making contributions on behalf of a client. In line with Wikipedia’s policies and the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use, I will add the appropriate paid editing disclosure to my user page and the talk pages of related articles.
Please let me know if you require any further information or actions from me. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this.
Why haven't i been responded to. I already did what you asked of me and you said i couldn't edit until things are clarified. Please kindly respond to this message
Hi, you also need to keep all your disclosures on your user page - do not delete them once you've finished working on a draft. In addition, it's usually best to avoid using LLMs/ChatGPT/AI on Wikipedia, including on talk pages. We want to talk to a human, not a machine. Meadowlark (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
I understood all you have said. So now, how's is my article submission on 'Stiven Mikhail' coming along. It's taking a whole lot of time to process. It's been more than 2 weeks now and I already made the required adjustments that was asked of me.
Please kindly consider my request. Creative Contents (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
I'm glad to hear you understand. Now please place a paid editing disclosure for Georgina Willis on your userpage as well as the one for Stiven Mikhail.
Your draft is not currently in the review queue - I think you may have accidentally removed the submission box when you removed the 'undisclosed paid editing' tag. I have put the submission box back for you. There's a lot of drafts waiting at the moment, so the current wait time is about 8 weeks. If you check back on your draft from time to time, you will be able to see the approximate wait time listed at the top of the submission box. Meadowlark (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Royiswariii was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN (being a councillor on a local government authority does not make him notable) - just a run of the mill businessman (CEO of a non-notable company).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amila Gammana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Creative Contents. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stiven Mikhail, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it againor request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for sports. The draft requires either:
Getting Started
Tips
Hello, I'm Spotemgottem. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Georgina Willis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Spotemgottem (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
