barnstars
Went to go warn this user about UPE and was freaked out when I saw a barnstar from you, then I realized why. 
Praxidicae (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- strictly, it was Wikilurve... there isn't a wikif*** offTheLongTone (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Please desist from making personal attacks
I hereby give you a warning notice that I will not accept you making personal attacks WP:PA, by leaving unsolicited and offensive comments on my talk page. Please note that despite your status as an autopatroller, you still need to abide by civil and ethical guidelines - clearly spelled out in WP:PA. I will remove all your existing comments from my talk page, and any further offensive comments will be referred to arbitration. --Very trivial (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I do not make personal attacks. I comment upon edits; and in this area I do no tolerate fools gladly.TheLongTone (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Regarding Serangoon Public Library page
Hi TheLongTone,
I had added the source from SingComm.com.sg about the new Serangoon Public Library which was opened on 11 March 2011.
Thank you.
GoAheadFan95 (talk) 02:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that a single news item about the library's opening does nothing (imo) to establish notability.TheLongTone (talk) 14:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I already removed the source from Singcomm.com.sg and added the source from The Straits Times (archived) to establish notability.
Thank you. GoAheadFan95 (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Devil Between My Toes (2)
Hi LongTone, in December last year I contacted you and asked you about your motivation behind turning the article Devil Between My Toes into a redirect to Guided by Voices. My question and your reply are in this archive. Today I rewrote the article on the Dutch Wikipedia and only then I noticed that you asked a question on the talk page weeks ago... So, here's my answer, in case you don't have that page on your watch list (anymore). I was never blocked here but I still sent an unblock request since I couldn't edit because of my vpn. (Back then I didn't understand the process described here.) My unblock request got an answer in the form of some default template that assumes that I was blocked. Maybe I should archive my talk page, as small as it is, just to avoid confusion and fix the first impression that page gives.
I have no intention to publish articles here since all my attention is devoted to the Dutch Wikipedia. I ran the article through Google Translate and it should be fairly comprehensible, though according to the translation Robert Pollard was bought by a rooster for its son. Feel free to translate it, if at all the band and their work are of any interest to you and you feel that the article now better agrees with the rules and guidelines here. Maartenschrijft (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- I still do not see why this record should be considered notable.TheLongTone (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
G8
Hi. I've declined your WP:G8 tag on Talk:2020 Toronto hammer attack. As the page exists as a redirect the talk page is not eligible for deletion. Please ping me or leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- No problemo, didn't know that keeping such talk pages was the norm.TheLongTone (talk) 15:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello I understand you've nominated my article for speedy deletion, because it doesn't explain why the title is important for Wikipedia. I don't want this to be deleted, please could you tell me where I need to declare this? Thanks EJohnL1985 (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Too late. But I think that it is generally accepted that an article creator will not want it deleted.TheLongTone (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Why did you nominate "List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2010s" page for deletion?
The page should not be deleted. Yes, there are many entries which don't have sourcing, but that is a project that me and others are currently working on at this time. It is a page which has value to Wikipedia at this current time.--Historyday01 (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Read the nomination, and comment on the discussion page.TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Exel Computer Systems - page deletion
Hello, you recently requested for this page to be removed because I didn't explain why this article is important to be published on Wikipedia. Please could you tell me where this needs to be done? Thank you EJohnL1985 (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC):Read WP:GNG.
- It was because firstly there was no credible claim of notability and secondly because the sources were not strong enough. But on the upside, I noticed that the previous version was deleted as being promotional, and I didn't detect the slightest whiff of spam in your later version.TheLongTone (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback! Could you explain why you thought the sources were not strong enough please? These were the only sources I could find surrounding the topic. EJohnL1985 (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Afraid I can't remember; the usual reasons would be that they looked like run of the mill coverage as generated by most busineses (often in trade papers0 or that they were self-published.TheLongTone (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
My ascertions regarding "Alex Ajipe" encyclopedia
Hi TheLongTone,
The "Alex Ajipe" encyclopedia isn't paid for as you've alledged and sincerely, I'm bittered and sad about that accusation.
All what I came up with there are sourced for and not for promotional purpose as you've also claimed or as it looks. I will agree with you that some contents looks so much like an advertisement which I think you deleted some and I've been trying to get some of those contents off the encyclopedia.
I must appreciate you for bringing that to my notice but I'll provide citations where necessarily for you to believe and reconsider your stand for speedy deletion of the page.
Thanks. Thisissegun (talk) 16:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Reason for revert of Devil Between My Toes
Hi TheLongTone,
If I didn't look in the right places for a response to why you reverted the Devil Between My Toes edit I made, then my apologies, I'm not a very active Wikipedian.
I was wondering why you reverted the article that I wrote for Devil Between My Toes, the first Guided by Voices album. I saw the post above where User:Maartenschrijft mentioned the same thing, but unlike their edit of the article, I included much more than just a track listing, such as facts about the packaging of the record, meanings of the songs on the record, writing credits, personnel, etc. If I had a lack of sources, I will gladly any more references to confirm the information I put in the article.
I also observed that your reasoning for deleting it the first time is that it's a "non-notable" release, but I would object to that in that this is the first full length record made by this band....without this, we wouldn't have Bee Thousand, at least narratively. On top of that, their third and fourth records, Self-Inflicted Aerial Nostalgia and Same Place the Fly Got Smashed, have very brief articles that don't really expand on giving more than just basic information. -- Hyperultra (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
AfD for The Ghana "34" Aluminum Bucket
Hi, you nominated The Ghana "34" Aluminum Bucket for deletion but you used the curation toolbar and it failed to complete the AfD procedures. (It's better to use twinkle for afd nominations.) Just letting you know so you can go back and finish the process. Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nm, Finngall completed the nomination. Schazjmd (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, saw that thanx; I edit from my library & my session ended before I could make good. I was using twinkle btw.TheLongTone (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Query regarding a deleted page
Hi sir/madam, I wanted to ask something if its not much of a trouble for you. There used to be a wikipedia article Sri Kshatriya Yuvak Sangh. I think it got deleted sometime ago as the link is now redirecting to Tan Singh. Firstly I wanted to read the discussion that took place for its deletion as I wanted to know how and why it got deleted, as I am new I don't know how to find that discussion. So if you could help me find it. Another thing is I read the article some time ago and saw that it has only one citation so i think if it got deleted due to poor citation, i wanted to improve that article as I know it is atleast important enough to have a separate wikipedia page. Another thing is as I was reading the rules, I got confused that how is an article that is deleted can be recreated. Should a new article is to be written afresh or old one can be undeleted if proper citations and notability issue is addressed. Please help me in this regard. Thanks in advance.Shanusar (talk) 16:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- TheLongTone, FYI, I was asked the same question (no idea why the two of us were targeted specifically, but ok) and have given an answer on my talk page, so you probably don't need to bother. Lennart97 (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Life is full of mysteries! Thanks. TheLongTone (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Accidental MfD
Hi TheLongTone. I closed this MfD since it was pretty clearly an accident. Hopefully this is fine and you don't mind. Perryprog (talk) 15:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sure thing. Its those fat fingers of mine.TheLongTone (talk) 13:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Aircraft names
Hi and many thanks for your lightning-fast review of my Cramlington Aerodrome article. Could you please tell me why you removed the Royal Aircraft Factory from the B.E.2c, making it the only aircraft type in the article not to have its manufacturer/designer name, and making the reference point to a redirect? Lestocq (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- So far as I am aware Royal Aircraft Factory aircraft are generally referred to simply by type number- B.E. 2c, S.E.5a, R.E.8. Cant really gine a reason why, it just eseems to be common usage. I'll look at the link again,since the BE2 article is fairly long and ideally the link should lead to the '2c rather than the top of the article.TheLongTone (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Peter Speake page
Hello TheLongTone, You have recently removed the Peter Speake page that I created. I was in the process of modifying the Speake-Marin page to redirect to the Peter Speake page for information on him. I was doing this because there is some misunderstanding on the Speake-Marin page on what Peter Speake's role in the company is (He was the founder but has left the company and is pursuing other professional activities). Should there not be a specific page? Peter Speake information will be removed from the Speake-Marin page of course. Please note that Peter does not use the Marin part of his sirname anymore. [1]Realdriver (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- You have a point, but I doubt that he passes the notability guidelines.TheLongTone (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
References
Lagi (song)
Special:Diff/1107694934, yes it is. Please read the sources. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 11:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Making threats is not snecking good. Inter-wiki links are good and help readers to find more information seamlessly. I agree over-linking is not good. However, I do not see much of an over linking problem in the article. Enjoy your day! SurgeArrest (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC
- I made no threats, I merely pointed out that your reinstatement of uneccessary links could be construed as didruptivre editing. Its useful, for instance, to link Brighton because people might not know where it is: it is not necessary to link knife or cat. I would suggestt you have a look at how links are handled in other articles. Incidentally, it would have been more appropriate to have made your post on your talk page, where the conversation began.TheLongTone (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for removing promotional elements of Caloocan High School, I tried to do so but was reverted by the article creator. However, before I noticed their reverts you already removed the promotional sections again. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Erika Donalds notability
Thanks for your attention to the new Erika Donalds article I created. I'm posting my ideas about notability on Talk:Erika_Donalds#Notability. Please consider removing the tag. Court Liberty (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Peer review/Supermarine S.4/archive1
Hi there, Supermarine S.4 is currently undergoing a peer review, as I am hoping to be able to get it promoted to FA. As you have edited the article in the past, could you take a look at the article again, and comment on how it could be improved? Amitchell125 (talk) 07:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Deletion for the Article
Hello, I have replied to you on Helianthus annuus 'Russian Giant' deletion discussion page. BloxyColaSweet (talk) 01:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for Roland Richard
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Roland Richard. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Hello, please consider withdrawing your nomination for withdrawal. The article has now significantly improved, including citations and sources, to allay your concerns.
Apologies for repeated messages elsewhere, I'm only now familiarizing myself with protocols of wiki bureacracy.
speedy deletion
you recently tag my page( K.M. Nahidul Islam ) for deletion . In this Page ,I add about my biography. As a wikipedia user, I can add it by abiding all wikipedia policy . Kindly keep this page . You found Any illegal text here, Just delete that text . maybe you understand good day -K.M. Nahidul Islam Kmnahidulislambd (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- I tagged it because it is a grossly promotional, contains no credible assertion why anyboedy other than yourself should consider the content of any significance or interest and you were either too lazy or unable to provide any references.TheLongTone (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- I understand. Now can you kindly fix this problem without deleting like change text? Kmnahidulislambd (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Like I said, too snecking lazy. And thoroughly NON NOTABLE.TheLongTone (talk) TheLongTone (talk) 13:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- I understand. Now can you kindly fix this problem without deleting like change text? Kmnahidulislambd (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Bobbygohann
Please can you explain your comment at User talk:Bobbygohann#A gert lump o babyfood for you! and also why is it dated 4 years ago? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A careless copy and paste for a clear case of a gert lump o spam.TheLongTone (talk) 14:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Please be more careful, and read your edits?
In this edit you left a nonsensical "decreasing in o thickness". Not what you meant I'm sure, but only to be detected if you check after the edit. Shenme (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Perfection is an attribute of the Allah. I'm human; I leave typos. What a pointless and stupid complaint. Please grow up.TheLongTone (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is quite a rude and unreasonable response to a polite request — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- A silly request. A sensible person would have simply corrected the error.TheLongTone (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is quite a rude and unreasonable response to a polite request — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Re: Big
I won't fight you on the BLAR, but I will say I'll probably take my own swing at reviving that later. I feel like there are sources discussing just how much he was absolutely hated in the past from what I've seen in my travels, but the current article is extremely rough. Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
You left a broken Wikilink
Hi user:TheLongTone , thank you for your contribution to an article I recently created. I just wanted to know if you are aware of the broken Wikilink you changed while removing content from article? the sentence can be found at Career section
" Martin received a nomination for song of the year]] "
would you be so kind to fix it or complete the actions you were busy with?
kind regards.
Chad. ChadLawrence021 (talk) 14:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- user: TheLongTone I hope I'm not asking to much, but while you busy reviewing the article do you mind marking it as reviewed as well? Thank you
- Chad. ChadLawrence021 (talk) 14:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are asking too much.TheLongTone (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- okay no problem. sorry about the multiple messages my WiFi was acting up and not giving internet, but Thank you for the quick reply though, have a nice day!
- chad. ChadLawrence021 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are asking too much.TheLongTone (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- user: TheLongTone I hope I'm not asking to much, but while you busy reviewing the article do you mind marking it as reviewed as well? Thank you
- Chad. ChadLawrence021 (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- ..I would have fixed it, but my edit history seems to have forgotten what it was. Didn't review it because I didn't have an opinion.TheLongTone (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Austerby
What makes you think removing it is a reason for deletion? Take it AfD. DragonofBatley (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your wish is my command. This article has no significant content.TheLongTone (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nationality edits
Your edits are simply wrong, for the reasons why please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#"Former nationality footballer" or "Nationality former footballer". GiantSnowman 18:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'd be more impressed if the link led anywhere of interest. But the fact that a load of kick the bakk enthusiasts have no nense of grammar does not surprise me one iota.TheLongTone (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Sir Nicolas Reardon-Smith, 5th Baronet - deletion nomination
@TheLongTone: I'm learning a lot (good things) from the prospective deletion of the Sir Nicolas Reardon-Smith, 5th Baronet article. But noting your opening statement "Unremarkable person who happens to be in Debrett's" this has rather set the tone with everyone following suit by commenting on his notability apropos the baronetcy, rather than the way others view him, namely as a leader of the shipping industry. Could you be so kind as to add a comment about his being a director of a multinational shipping company, so that the discussion does not get skewed too far in the wrong direction? RSVP. Best Primm1234 (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Certainly his business career is more likely to confer notability but there are plenty of people who manage to have a successful career at a fairly high level without generating anything other than run of the mill coverage.TheLongTone (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TheLongTone: many thanks & looks like we're singing from the same hymn sheet - I've made some small additional edits to the article, which hopefully are to your satisfaction. I shall be incommunicado over the weekend so do let me know if you have any further thoughts as to what if anything needs to be done to get it up to speed. Thanking you et al for your guidance & looking forward to hearing. Best Primm1234 (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Seems like this has already been deleted. I'm sorry that this effort has been unsuccessful & that the experience does not put you off.TheLongTone (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TheLongTone: many thanks & looks like we're singing from the same hymn sheet - I've made some small additional edits to the article, which hopefully are to your satisfaction. I shall be incommunicado over the weekend so do let me know if you have any further thoughts as to what if anything needs to be done to get it up to speed. Thanking you et al for your guidance & looking forward to hearing. Best Primm1234 (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Confederation of the Rhine Flag AfD/draftification
Hey there,
I was about to draftify Flag for the Confederation of the Rhine just as you AfD'd it - I think it might be better off as a draft so that the user can work on it further, give them a chance to establish RSes for it, etc. Seeking advice on this as you're clearly a lot more experienced on this than I am: can one draftify an article under AfD?
Cheers, CR (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wouldn't oppose draftifying; I suggest you 'vote' for this on the AfD page. Altho I doubt if the subject is notable, and anything there is could easily be included in the article on the Confederacy of the Rhine.TheLongTone (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Kirk Callwood
I saved this, barely. Can you wait for a few days before going to WP:AfD? Bearian (talk) 19:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- For sure, only PRODed it as an unreferenced BLP.TheLongTone (talk) 15:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Thomas Mackenbrock
Article is right back in mainspace with no improvements made in draftspace outside a 'no that's not your own work' publicity photo. Nathannah • 📮 20:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up.TheLongTone (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wayne Lee Rea III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive
| May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
| September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Why full revert on Bombshell?
If you argue that it's a non-notable song, wouldn't it make more sense to put up the non-notable template than a full revert? That way it could at least be discussed rather than unilaterally decided? TheSaturnLover (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- It used to be a redirect, so I am clearly not alone in thinking that it is not notable. There is nothing in the article to suggest notability. Changing it back to a redirect saves uneccessary work imo,; if you feel really strongly that it deserves an article revert my edit & I'll take it to AfD.TheLongTone (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- If you would, please. I'll find more secondary sources to work with notability. TheSaturnLover (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- In compliance with this (and so I didn't have to re-upload the images used) I have re-instated the article, added the notability template, and found more sources. I will continue on as time finds its way to trickle stunningly down upon the proverbial hands of mine self. :P TheSaturnLover (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- To say that you are not alone in thinking that it is not notable is not necessarily true. I created the redirect in my early days because I believed that it was a plausible search term. I am in no way opposed to an article if somehow the effort was shown that it could be notable, but as it stands right at this time I am ambivalent. mftp dan oops 16:38, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- It used to be a redirect, so I am clearly not alone in thinking that it is not notable. There is nothing in the article to suggest notability. Changing it back to a redirect saves uneccessary work imo,; if you feel really strongly that it deserves an article revert my edit & I'll take it to AfD.TheLongTone (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Bravada Vodka
Please tell me why you deleted the Bravada Vodka article. It has four references.
I didn't delete it; I merely nominated it for deletion because the article itself- what there was of it- was clearly promotional rather that having any content of substance and I did not think that the sources were of any real substance either. Clearly I was not alone in this opoinion since an admin chose to delete the article in short order.TheLongTone (talk) 11:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026
Hello TheLongTone,
Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards
Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.
January–February backlog drive
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
May backlog drive
An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.
PageTriage
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 6 June 2026 (UTC)