User talk:Toast1454 · Paulipedia

ahhh	This user talk page has been vandalised very many times.

Welcome!

Hello, Toast1454, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rain World. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TheWikiToby (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Toast why u remove my editors Bosh67masterful (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2024

Hi Toast1454! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Rain World that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

rain world

rain world

coding and stuff here. unless you use visual editor -chaotic-thing- (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 11:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Understood, my bad. Toast1454 (talk) 12:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Toast1454. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 16:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 180.150.55.167 (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC) why did you revert the change

Your two edits that I have reverted do not conform to Wikipedia's editing guidelines. You can find them here. Please take some time to read and familiarize yourself with them.

Specifically, your edits are non-encyclopedic and do not fit the formal tone of Wikipedia. Toast1454_T_C 23:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your edits also appear to be personal opinions, which is against Wikipedia guidelines. Toast1454_T_C 23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Re this blind revert to Tofu-dreg project, which added back unsourced material to the article, and the subsequent incorrect warning you left on my talk page.

It is one of Wikipedia's strongest policies that all additions of information must include a citation, especially when they accuse people of a crime. You should know this by now.

My edit removing the accusation had an edit summary that you ignored in your hurry to revert using automated tools. Misuse of automated tools in this way can lead to editors having them removed.

Please slow down and be more careful in future. And also revert you addition of unsourced accusations to the article. Thanks. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Friendly fire! No hard feelings, from one vandalism fighter to another. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks toast

I am very grateful that you changed the page and gave criticism so I’ll say again thanks Mediolgy (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Warning users for editing the sandbox

Warning for this isn't necessary, as a bot will reinsert the header. Cutlass ^Ciera 18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

U.S. Sugar 148

Thanks, whole bunch of these and some edit-warring too: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Cylinder count parameter and positioning of cylinders. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Removing information I just added to a page. It is 100% factual even if not available to the public yet. NWood1 (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

You need a reliable source to back up any claims that may be disputed, even to the slightest degree.

Also, you claimed to be an employee of Essendant. This means a there is a high chance of a conflict of interest, where you may add bias due to your connection to the article subject.

Here is more information about reliable sources.

Here is more information about the Wikipedia policy about bias.

Hope this helps. Toast1454_T_C 14:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hi, Toast1454. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 204.111.137.20 (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

I'm still not seeing the purpose behind the Melotone Records disambiguation page. Nothing links there except your talk page. Toast1454_T_C 19:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Again you need to read WP:CSD, so please answer one simple question, is Melotone currently a DAB page as of 1900 UTC today when you placed the speedy tag? yes or no will do. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Which Melotone page are you referring to here? Melotone Records (disambiguation) or Melotone? Toast1454_T_C 19:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

The one I linked, Melotone, please answer with yes or no. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 19:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Yes, Melotone has been a disambiguation page for years now. The CSD tag was placed on the redirect to the disambiguation. Toast1454_T_C 20:02, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

We're getting to that. So again yes or no will do here, as of 1900 UTC today when you placed the speedy tag did Melotone Records (disambiguation) target Melotone? 204.111.137.20 (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Yes, the redirect to disambiguation has always targeted Melotone.

I have something to attend to, please hold the conversation. Toast1454_T_C 20:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by hold, I don't expect prompt replies nor do I infer anything from explained tardiness.

Returning to the topic, you have admitted knowledge that at the time of your speedy tagging the redirect it was placed on targeted a disambiguation page. So I would like to understand why given that knowledge you would place Template:Db-g14 since the only redirects the criteria applies to are "Redirects that end in "(disambiguation)" but target neither disambiguation pages nor pages that perform disambiguation-like functions (such as set index articles or lists)". 204.111.137.20 (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

I misread the G14 criteria, they are written in a confusing manner. Toast1454_T_C 21:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

On the contrary G14 is entirely unambiguous, all bad speedy tags do is waste time; please refrain from tagging any pages for speedy until you have read and understood the criteria. Also judging by your message on my talk page you don't seem to understand the differrence between a speedy tag and an AFD notice, so you should spend some time familiarizing yourself with deletion policy more generally before continuing to make edits in the area, thank you. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 21:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Warning : Rollback

You were reminded above of the following when you were granted rollback privileges : "Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked."

This edit is clearly a content dispute against an anonymous editor, restoring information that is under contention. Irrespective of whether this is a well explained edit, it's clearly made with the intent of improving the encyclopedia.

If I see repeated abuse of the rollback privileges, I'm afraid they will have to be withdrawn. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

I still don't see why the content should be removed. What's wrong with it? Toast1454_T_C 11:27, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

I have no opinion on the content; suffice to say you should not use anti-vandalism tools on an edit simply because you disagree with it. I would advise you to forget about project maintenance entirely and focus solely on writing articles. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

The source allows the contested table to be updated from 2021, should this be done instead of completely removing it? Toast1454_T_C 15:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

toast

	The Yum ToaSt
	I'll STAY forever, oh I'll STAY here! I'll STAY forever, I'm right here! StrayKidsStayForever (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Woodhey High School

That's not vandalism, it's a content dispute. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Woodhey High School. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 15:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I haven't broken the 3RR yet, and I think I'll open an RFC on the talk page. Seeing the page history, do you think the page should be protected? Toast1454_T_C 15:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I didn't say you did, and personally I'd say use IP blocks instead of protection if the TAs continue edit warring. Established users like you and I should know better, but I can understand the mistake because I almost reverted and warned the one TA for blanking myself when I first stumbled across it in recent changes. It's easy for RC patrol to start to feel like whack-a-mole, but it's really more like those training exercises USA law enforcement have with shoot/don't shoot scenario targets, and reverting a good edit is like accidently shooting the little old lady or mom with kids cut out. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: telling me your blood type, I did not know toast could have blood, let alone a blood type, I am now scared. I hope this did not hurt too much. Thapy- comechatツ 05:28, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Addition to the Article on Mian Sarfraz Kalhoro

I added from the book "Sindh and the Races that Inhabit The Valley of Indus" by Richard F Burton. The book is available for free online in pdf form. You can verify it from there. Tariq Barki (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Use this citation template and re-add the material. I can't access the book pdf right now. Toast1454_T_C 18:09, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

I tried to add reference but was not able to. I clicked the cite button also and did all. Nothing worked. Apologies for my naivety. Tariq Barki (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

New to Wikipedia

Hi I really love mountains so I’m trying to edit the page “Pumori” and I dont understand how to add citations can anybody help me? KhunzWiki (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm not too experienced with adding citations. You could try heading to the teahouse, they can help you more than I can. Toast1454_T_C 15:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Season’s Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Toast1454, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,
ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:40, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:40, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Reverted Edit to Angels & Airwaves

Hello, I saw your message on my page about an edit of mine you reverted on the page for Angels & Airwaves. In your revert comment, you said that my edit was not explained, which if I'm being honest, I disagree with. A comment was left when the edit was made clearly stating that the removed content was biased speculation on the part of whoever added it. Nothing in the provided source discussing "possibly putting Angels & Airwaves on a hold," which is why this was removed. I don't know if you may have missed the comment left on my edit, so if you could explain a bit more, it would clarify the situation. Thank you. !SmadeB! (talk) 19:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

The content in question has sources that meet the RS criteria, so unless you can find additional sources that call it speculation, the content stays. Toast1454_T_C 19:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

I am so sorry about that. I meant to block the sockpuppet and must have clicked on your name instead. Please accept my apology for the error. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

No worries, I see accidental blocks all the time. Toast1454_T_C 18:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Audrey Hepburn

Hello amazing editor! I really like this image and it suits the article way better. What do you think? --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been told multiple times to stop adding that image. Other editors prefer the orginal image used in the article. Toast1454_T_C 18:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

I know, but it got accepted twice though. Check the view history. And it is an amazing image. I don't like the original colourised version. It looks messy on the article. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Do you have any kind of personal connection to Audrey Hepburn? Toast1454_T_C 18:37, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Soulmate connection and world's second Hepburn, continuing her mission for UNICEF. --Dove Hepburn (talk) 18:45, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Please read this policy. Toast1454_T_C 18:47, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Audrey means "noble strength" and Dove means "peace". You see the connection? Both names pair well together. Audrey held a dove in the film Funny Face (1957) and Two for the Road (1967). --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

How is this relevant? Toast1454_T_C 18:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

You asked me what my connection was to her. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Have you read the COI policy? And I don't see how those movies are related. Toast1454_T_C 18:56, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

I'll take a read and in both films, Audrey's characters hold a dove, and that's my name. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Is there any reason you prefer that image other than it simply looking better? Toast1454_T_C 19:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

I shared those personal details because you asked, but my goal is strictly to improve the article's quality. The current lead image is a low-quality AI colourisation that looks grainy and unnatural. The version I’m suggesting is a high-resolution, historically accurate restoration. Can we focus on which image provides the best encyclopedic value for the readers? And we all know that the one I'm suggesting is the better image. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

The current image does look AI-colored. You can proceed with your image. Toast1454_T_C 19:21, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Done and now it's pending. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

The discussion about which image to use needs to take place on the article's talk page where interested editors can participate in order to gain WP:consensus. The discussion here is meaningless. S0091 (talk) S0091 (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Harry potter and the half-blood prince

Hi Toast1454. Thank you for telling me about me editing. im new to editing. i came on here because id like to try journalism and wanted to try putting out my opinions on articles.Apparently im not to good at it hehe.Umm if you could give me some pointers that'd be awsome :> thanks so much! -The queer journalist ~2026-19693-86 (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

You could probably go to the teahouse for advice, they can probably help you more than I can. Toast1454_T_C 18:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!! Ive been trying to find that. ~2026-19693-86 (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Clarification regarding article removal

Hello,

I noticed that in the article "Ice skating" the section I have added " Climate change impact on ice skating" was removed due to concern that it was AI generated. I would like to clarify that the new section I wrote myself.

If there are specific parts that raised concern, I would appreciate your feedback.

I have also decide to remove last paragraph in order to keep my section focused and organized.

Thank you. Aghavni Ghazayan (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

The added paragraphs read as abviously AI-generated or assisted. Did you use any tools such as grammar improving software or translators? Toast1454_T_C 15:34, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

canton academy

Why did you revert the information? ~2026-21861-90 (talk) 17:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

1. You are adding information not supported by the source.

2. You are edit warring. Toast1454_T_C 17:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

"Disruptive" editing

Good afternoon, from Portugal,

per this message (please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:~2026-25929-92; it's also me, i sometimes edit logged off, not a wiki-crime i believe), kindly do tell me where do you see the disruptive editing? The editor before me even told in their summary "please change this into something better, the bot told me to do this shit", and their sentence needed upgrading (and i saw no problem whatsoever with the previous version hence i reinstated it).

I also did some "disruptive" editing at Jorge Pulido (adding NINE references for example, now all the important topics/paragraphs and honours and sourced), i would appreciate it if you did not accuse of something i never did here (and i have been here for almost 20 years)!

Attentively RevampedEditor (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles should be written in a neutral tone, especially articles about living people. You addition of A talented and creative attacking midfielder with an eye for goal in not written in a neutral and encyclopedic tone, as well as Valerón was known for his vision and technical abilities, especially his passing skills and ball control, but was also injury-prone and inconsistent. Toast1454_T_C 15:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your talk page

This is also a talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Boys_from_Brazil_(film)

why did you undo my removal of rotten tomatoes and Meta critics information?

This information is not even live, it was captured and mentioned in resp. 2020 and 2024.

The movie is dated in 1978 (no internet) so no internet response?

If they bring out a movie in 2026, reviews on websites might be actually captioning the moment, but not for movies from 1978.

They outdate the internet and don't need these mentions, unless they are live api calls to these websites (which they aren't).

Let's talk. Wikimiddleaccnl101 (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Indian locomotive class WDM-3 when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:25, 23 May 2026 (UTC)