Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Spain

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Spain. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Spain|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Spain. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
watch
Scan for Spain related AfDs

Scan for Spain related Prods
Scan for Spain related TfDs

Spain

Celtic F.C. 2–1 FC Barcelona


Celtic F.C. 2–1 FC Barcelona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article about an individual match that, while interesting, lacks the lasting and sustained in-depth coverage to warrant its own article. Geschichte (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment The article definitely passes WP:SIGCOV as more the half of the sources talk about the match in depth, rather than brief mentions. YeetV4 (talk) 18:52, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Álvaro González (footballer, born 2007)


Álvaro González (footballer, born 2007) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded and it was suggested it either be user or drafitied. Both seem fine to me, but don't believe this currently meets notability, no SIGCOV. Probably a TOOSOON if his career continues the way it has. Porterjoh (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Agnes, wife of Ramiro I of Aragon


Agnes, wife of Ramiro I of Aragon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could only find genealogies and mentions, nothing substantial. Article content reflects the lack of information. This could be redirected to Ramiro I of Aragon#Marriage and children where she is mentioned. Themeparks (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete Redirect. No notability beyond anything she might inherit from her husband(s) and father. Athel cb (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect as per nom until (unless) additional sourcing can be found. M kuhner (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect per nom. Mccapra (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment. Yes, Redirect is a better choice than Delete. I've changed my vote. Athel cb (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect or delete. No citations and no content that is not already given elsewhere. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect as suggested, and as reasonable in these circumstances. All biographies should have sources, even long dead people. Bearian (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

CIGESA

AfDs for this article:
CIGESA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains primary sources only, I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this company in secondary sources. The Catalonian Wikipedia article doesn't appear to have any either. If there are sources in Catalonian that I was not able to find, of course they can be included in this discussion and ideally added to the article. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 09:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

--Mcapdevila (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Secondary sources added
  • 14 Secondary sources have been added

--Mcapdevila (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2026 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:58, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
I am not seeing WP:SIGCOV in any of the sources. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 11:04, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Hahaha, for you it is not an important coverage that secondary sources published that all catalan public libraries are dependent of the Centre Informàtic de la Generalitat de Catalunya?
do you want more coverage..
I've been working as an external consultant in PTOP and DGPT and as in the rest of the thousands of computer terminal and client PC's they couldn't work without the Centre Informàtic de la Generalitat de Catalunya Mcapdevila (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment The article as it currently exists has fewer secondary sources than it appears to: the two Munoz-Cobo 1994 are the same (though they strangely disagree on the author's first name), the three Subirats 2006 are the same (though one inexplicably in English), and "Fent funcionar el país" appears as both a journal and a book (it seems to be the latter) total of 7 times. Author, it would help if you cleaned up the referencing. Could you point out the three best secondary sources for independent, reliable, substantial coverage, please? M kuhner (talk) 15:17, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
    I am adding "progressively" all the dozens of secondary sources that the proposer for deletion @Mariamnei was unable to find (I imagine without bad intention), probably because she didn't use the official name of Centre Informàtic de la Generalitat de Catalunya, that I wouldn't dear to use in en.wikipedia.org
    Subirats 3 times repetition, has been corrected and the 7 times you've mentioned (each time pointing to a different page, ergo not duplicated) of "Fent funcionar el pais" It's not a publication and besides being a video in youtube that I've added,it's a book https://search.worldcat.org/title/733887881?oclcNum=733887881&__cf_chl_f_tk=gPWNyOJhaLz1eDKW2yMFsF7gjlvM__mMqPEgEHDwaXg-1782821622-1.0.1.1-TPGGngOY1SvMT810O4F2PG0i3mVwUlOzpBmtv4zsSEY
    Joan Muñoz-Cobo, This is how it appears on the cover, in the Fundesco catalog and in the academic bibliographic references.
Therefore, the correct citation is::
Muñoz-Cobo, Joan (1994). Historia de la informatica pública en España. Fundesco. pp. 201–203.
Sources that confirm the name “Joan Muñoz-Cobo”
Catalog of the National Library of Spain (BNE)
Fundesco (Foundation for the Development of Social Communication Functions) records
Citations in academic articles on the history of administrative computing in Spain

--Mcapdevila (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Next Extremaduran regional election


Next Extremaduran regional election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON The next election to the Assembly of Extremadura isn't due until 2030. The article's content is copied from previous election articles with just a few minor amendments made for dates etc. Nothing that can be described as encyclopedic content.

I am not proposing draftifying as articles should only be moved to draft space if they are likely to become notable in the near future. Four years isn't the near future. Drafts may deleted after six months. Draftifying shouldn't be used as back door to deletion. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Spain. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Article covers an event that is notable and almost certain to take place (per WP:FUTURE), and already contains information and speculation about a repeat election taking place following the previous election as government negotiations were problematic, as well as information on new candidates (particularly the PSOE's), so it already clears TOOSOON. Also, note that snap elections are possible and that 2030 is the latest possible legal date, not a fixed date (for example, the 2025 Extremaduran regional election took place slightly over two years since the previous one). This nomination is also contradictory with the nom's own argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Brandenburg state election, where they argued for a "Speedy keep" noting that "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." That assertion was true back then and remains true to this day. Note other similar AfDs resulting in "Keep" due to specific verifiable information already existing on future elections, such as:
Among others. Impru20talk 20:52, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON election takes place in 2030 which is way too far in advance for a page. Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
TOOSOON does not relate to any point of time (we have 2032 Summer Olympics for example). And as stated above, the next election does not have to be held in 2030, but by 2030; that is why the article is titled "next" and not "2030". The 2025 election was held much earlier than scheduled. There is already sourced speculation and verifiable information available. Impru20talk 08:41, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In this particular context, the existence of other "next" election type articles is *not* determinative of notability, the existence of sourcing (or not) is the crucial point. Contributors should address whether or not there is reliable sourcing to satisify a stand alone article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:42, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Next Castilian-Leonese regional election


Next Castilian-Leonese regional election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON The next election to the Cortes of Castile and León isn't due until 2030. The article's content is copied from previous election articles with just a few minor amendments made for dates etc. Nothing that can be described as encyclopedic content.

I am not proposing draftifying as articles should only be moved to draft space if they are likely to become notable in the near future. Four years isn't the near future. Drafts may deleted after six months. Draftifying shouldn't be used as back door to deletion. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Spain. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Article covers an event that is notable and almost certain to take place (per WP:FUTURE), and already contains information and speculation about a repeat election taking place following the previous election as government negotiations were problematic, so it already clears TOOSOON. Also, note that snap elections are possible and that 2030 is the latest possible legal date, not a fixed date. This nomination is also contradictory with the nom's own argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Brandenburg state election, where they argued for a "Speedy keep" noting that "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." That assertion was true back then and remains true to this day. Note other similar AfDs resulting in "Keep" due to specific verifiable information already existing on future elections, such as:
Among others. Impru20talk 20:52, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete via WP:CRYSTALBALL much of this article is speculation over an election that will not happen until 2030. Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

TOOSOON does not relate to any point of time (we have 2032 Summer Olympics for example). And as stated above, the next election does not have to be held in 2030, but by 2030; that is why the article is titled "next" and not "2030". There is already sourced speculation and verifiable information available. Impru20talk 08:43, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In this particular context, the existence of other "next" election type articles is *not* determinative of notability, the existence of sourcing (or not) is the crucial point. Contributors should address whether or not there is reliable sourcing to satisify a stand alone article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:42, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Next Aragonese regional election


Next Aragonese regional election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON The next election to the Cortes of Aragon isn't due until 2030. The article's content is copied from previous election articles with just a few minor amendments made for dates etc. Nothing that can be described as encyclopedic content.

I am not proposing draftifying as articles should only be moved to draft space if they are likely to become notable in the near future. Four years isn't the near future. Drafts may deleted after six months. Draftifying shouldn't be used as back door to deletion. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Spain. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Article covers an event that is notable and almost certain to take place (per WP:FUTURE), and already contains information and speculation about a repeat election taking place following the previous election as government negotiations were problematic, so it already clears TOOSOON. Also, note that snap elections are possible and that 2030 is the latest possible legal date, not a fixed date (for example, the 2026 Aragonese regional election took place before three full years had passed since the previous one). This nomination is also contradictory with the nom's own argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Brandenburg state election, where they argued for a "Speedy keep" noting that "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." That assertion was true back then and remains true to this day. Note other similar AfDs resulting in "Keep" due to specific verifiable information already existing on future elections, such as:
Among others. Impru20talk 20:52, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:CRYSTALBALL election is too far out in the future to have a page. Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:20, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

We have 2032 Summer Olympics for example, so being "too far out in the future" is not really an argument. There is already sourced speculation and verifiable information available. Impru20talk 08:43, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFF Isn't a valid keep rationale. And just for note, most of the AFDS cited are National elections rather than regional elections. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:27, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Not OTHERSTUFF, that was only brought to counter the "too far out in the future" claim because that is not what TOOSOON means. On the national vs. regional election issue, sure, take these:
Plus, I again highlight the nom's own rationale in one of these past AfDs for a regional election: "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." It is not clear why or how this article does not comprise that rationale, or why the nom has changed their view without any apparent reason, but that view is the current established practice in Wikipedia for "Next" election articles (of any kind, not just "national" but "regional" too).
And even in those cases where such articles have been deemed as TOOSOON due to the absence of any source, practice has been to draftify, not delete (see recent AfDs for Indian state legislative assemblies).
If it is of interest, there is also a similar regional/state ongoing AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Baden-Württemberg state election. Impru20talk 07:33, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In this particular context, the existence of other "next" election type articles is *not* determinative of notability, the existence of sourcing (or not) is the crucial point. Contributors should address whether or not there is reliable sourcing to satisify a stand alone article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:42, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Next Andalusian regional election


Next Andalusian regional election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON The next election to the Parliament of Andalusia isn't due until 2030. The article's content is copied from previous election articles with just a few minor amendments made for dates etc. Nothing that can be described as encyclopedic content.

I am not proposing draftifying as articles should only be moved to draft space if they are likely to become notable in the near future. Four years isn't the near future. Drafts may deleted after six months. Draftifying shouldn't be used as back door to deletion. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Spain. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Article covers an event that is notable and almost certain to take place (per WP:FUTURE), and already contains information and speculation about a repeat election taking place following the previous election, so it already clears TOOSOON. Also, note that snap elections are possible and that 2030 is the latest possible legal date, not a fixed date (if government negotiations fail, an election can take place this same year). This nomination is also contradictory with the nom's own argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Brandenburg state election, where they argued for a "Speedy keep" noting that "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." That assertion was true back then and remains true to this day. Note other similar AfDs resulting in "Keep" due to specific verifiable information already existing on future elections, such as:
Among others. Impru20talk 20:52, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
We have 2032 Summer Olympics for example, so being "too far out" is not really an argument; page does comply with both TOOSOON and CRYSTALBALL. There is already sourced speculation and verifiable information available. Impru20talk 08:43, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFF Isn't a valid keep rationale. And just for note, most of the AFDS cited are National elections rather than regional elections. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:25, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Not OTHERSTUFF, that was only brought to counter the "too far out in the future" claim because that is not what TOOSOON means. On the national vs. regional election issue, sure, take these:
Plus, I again highlight the nom's own rationale in one of these past AfDs for a regional election: "It's now standard practice to create articles for the next election as soon as the current election is over, even if the date is variable/not known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election, Next Spanish general election. If there are specific issues with the article, editors should try to fix the issue or place an appropriate maintenance tag so that other editors are aware, rather than pressing the nuclear button to delete the article." It is not clear why or how this article does not comprise that rationale, or why the nom has changed their view without any apparent reason, but that view is the current established practice in Wikipedia for "Next" election articles (of any kind, not just "national" but "regional" too).
And even in those cases where such articles have been deemed as TOOSOON due to the absence of any source, practice has been to draftify, not delete (see recent AfDs for Indian state legislative assemblies).
If it is of interest, there is also a similar regional/state ongoing AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Baden-Württemberg state election. Impru20talk 07:34, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In this particular context, the existence of other "next" election type articles is *not* determinative of notability, the existence of sourcing (or not) is the crucial point. Contributors should address whether or not there is reliable sourcing to satisify a stand alone article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:42, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
The repeat election may or may not happen, but the fact that so many sources are discussing it and a specific date for such election is even being reported, yet some users seemingly turn a blind eye and pretend that all of that does not exist, is rather puzzling. The "delete" arguments are based on this election taking place in 2030 (disregarding the possibility of a snap election happening, as elections in Andalusia are not fixed) when sources are actively discussing it taking place in October this year. The sole possibility of this event taking place is already notable and is an active influence in government negotiations, with a set schedule already in place in case these negotiations fail to come to fruition; all of that already reported by sources. Impru20talk 13:42, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
And more today: , now it is the regional president himself who has set the date of a possible repeat election on 25 October. Impru20talk 10:06, 30 June 2026 (UTC)


Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also