User talk:Kokopelli-UK

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Puerto De Luna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

It looked okay and is now accepted I believe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgrbengal (talkcontribs) 10:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Abo Canyon was accepted

Abo Canyon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank C. Hibben, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yuma and High Plains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cittaslow
added links pointing to Bischofsheim, Enns, Yea, Blanquefort, Segonzac and Blue Mountains

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boeing B-29 Superfortress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buckman, New Mexico has been accepted

Buckman, New Mexico, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 17:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Buckman, New Mexico

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Kokopelli-UK, thanks for creating Buckman, New Mexico!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. ,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kokopelli-UK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

May 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oreo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Toddst1 (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kokopelli-UK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kokopelli-UK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George McJunkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arroyo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gas turbine locomotive into Baldwin Locomotive Works. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cab forward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firebox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Alamos, New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cottonwood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Car and Driver into Erwin Baker. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of University of New Mexico buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George M. Williamson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jointed Boiler Locomotive has been accepted

Jointed Boiler Locomotive, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jointed Boiler Locomotive has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jointed Boiler Locomotive. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Some New Mexico green chiles for you!

Hatch green chiles Green Chile thanks
Some Hatch green chiles for you! Thank you for cleaning up the the Black on black ware article. You might enjoy joining WikiProject New Mexico, more information here: WP:WikiProject New Mexico.

Netherzone (talk) 12:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Van Dorn Hooker (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kokopelli-UK! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Van Dorn Hooker has been accepted

Van Dorn Hooker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination

I've submitted a nom for a "Did you know" feature on Wikipedia's home page: Template:Did you know nominations/Van Dorn Hooker. It usually takes a few days to a month for reviews to be completed and the DYK to be promoted to the front page. Good work, by the way! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Van Dorn Hooker

On 1 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Van Dorn Hooker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that architect Van Dorn Hooker, who served in the USAAF, was a cartoonist for Army news publications, and painted aircraft nose art? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Van Dorn Hooker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Van Dorn Hooker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White Rock, New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chama, New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chama River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

"Anglo"

Hello, there is no need to link to "Anglo", or to put quotation marks around it, per MOS:OL and MOS:SCAREQUOTES. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for your response. I take your point about the quotation marks, but I do think that the link to Anglo#United States is appropriate: Many readers within regions with large Hispanic presence (myself included, when I lived in NM) routinely use "Anglo" to describe virtually any European-lineage person, but I suspect many outside those regions aren't familiar with this usage (It's certainly true here in the UK). I've since discovered (without specifically looking for them) several instances in Southwestern US Wiki articles which use Anglo casually, and have added the link - albeit without the quotation marks.
Regards Kokopelli-UK (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Please start a discussion on the article talk pages, so other editors can also contribute. As a courtesy, please ping me to discussions in which I am involved. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Nambé Ware moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nambé Ware. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 20:31, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nambé Ware has been accepted

Nambé Ware, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 14:23, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Many thanks for the review - and especially for the additional paragraphs on designers and products (I'd managed to miss these)! Kokopelli-UK (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
ty Penginator89 (talk) 17:30, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
My first Barnstar, after 13 years of irregular editing! Many thanks.
I had a look at your own user page, and was impressed that you, as a relative beginner, had taken on a relatively complex page in crafting D&RGW C-19. Most novices (me included, back in the day) started with a simpler subject without tables and images. Well done, and happy editing! Kokopelli-UK (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you!! Penginator89 (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thank you so much :D Penginator89 (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Apologies, I forgot I already sent one haha Penginator89 (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

June 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tohatchi, New Mexico, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:21, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Magnolia677, obviously I am not @Kokopelli-UK, however I'm familiar with their editing, and they are totally a good faith editor. Having done a lot of work on-Wiki myself, and research and fieldwork off-Wiki on Navajo and Pueblo topics, I think their edits are good, it's just that they need to make sure that they always source added content properly, and I'm happy to work with them if Kokopelli-UK is agreeable. What say, Kokopelli?
I also think that edits like adding the image of a Two Grey Hills rug was perfectly fine, and should be restored. It is not simply decorative, and Two Grey Hills is an important style that originates from this area. I also think it's ok to add Jim Chee, as long as it is clear that he is a fictional person. He would belong in a new section called "In popular culture" or something like that. Because Chee has his own well sourced article, it may not be necessary to add a source, altho it's best practice to do so.
I haven't looked thru all the edits yet, but this popped up on my watchlist, so I thought I'd reach out to the both of you. Cheers and hope your early summer days are going well. Best regards, Netherzone (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I've already made the Jim Chee amendments to Tohatchi, New Mexico much as you've described, and will reinstall the rug image if Magnolia677 doesn't himself. I've crossed paths with him a few times before, usually helpful but 3 or 4 times that my edits have been wrongly deleted - I suspect because he hasn't thoroughly checked the context and/or content. (I'm male, by the bye, so the "they" needn't apply) Kokopelli-UK (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
@Netherzone: Could you please discuss this on the article talk page. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:46, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
@Magnolia677: Thanks for adding info and images of the schools. I will reintroduce the rug image, the Jim See entry as supported by @Netherzone, and also add a “red” link to Juanita as requested.
One request, though: You’ve twice reverted my edits (Tohatchi and Embudo, New Mexico while I had these pages open and was actually in process of editing. A simple “citation required” would be sufficient, and easier for me to correct without risking an editing war. I do follow through on these, even if it’s hours or even days later. (l rarely edit continuously, probably averaging an hour or so per day) Kokopelli-UK (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Sure thing, @Magnolia677, and a nice Sunday (and a Father's Day if that applies) to the both of you. Netherzone (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Kokopelli-UK, please stop adding a picture of a rug to an article about a community in New Mexico. The image you are adding is already on Navajo weaving. Please start a discussion on the article talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:07, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
@Magnolia677, it is totally relevant to have an image of Two Grey Hills woven rug in this article. Two Grey Hills weaving style is indigenous to this place/village. It is culturally relevant, and very much so. I had added two images to show the variation within the style which you also deleted.
Please stop removing the image(s), especially after I had added an entire sourced paragraph about this style of Navajo weaving to the article. Thanks and best, Netherzone (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
I have started a discussion on the article talk page. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:43, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
There already is a discussion on talk. Could you please move your suggestions to the one that is already present there? Thanks and best, Netherzone (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Alamos, New Mexico, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pembroke College was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Now corrected - thank you, bot Kokopelli-UK (talk) 11:33, 28 June 2026 (UTC)