No article found for “1988 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council election?action=edit&redlink=1”.

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 21

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

June 21

Template:Footer Asian Games Champions Xiangqi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. A reasonable argument has been made that the content of this template could easily be merged into the parent navbox but there was no specific consensus to do so; feel free to discuss further on the template talk or re-nominate with that as the explicit proposal. Primefac (talk) 08:05, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

It doesn't look necessary, this sport had been on the program just twice. we can re-create this template if Xiangqi appears once again the program, there will be more pages to be linked in that case but right now it's just one person with an existing article on wikipedia. Sports2021 (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep. Standard template of the Category:Asian Games champions navigational boxes variety. A year was missing at the time of the nomination and I have added it. There are two blue links for the champions now. The redlinked champions are notable individuals.—Alalch E. 23:40, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment Standard templates in that mentioned category cover one event (like this) not a sport as a whole. Just correcting. Sports2021 (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
      There are multiple diving disciplines and for each there is a corresponding event, but there are not multiple xiangqi disciplines, so the whole sport is covered by one event. —Alalch E. 00:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
      • Good, that's exactly my point, that's why I think this template should be deleted until this sport appears one or two more times in the Asian Games program, then there is a good reason to have two separate templates for Men's event and Women's event of Xiangqi. Having one template covering the whole sport is not a common thing in wikipedia. Sports2021 (talk) 00:48, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
        It's a particular type of sports navbox, of the "footer X champions" variety. See, for example Template:Footer Olympic Champions in Freestyle Skiing Men. These templates are yellow, list champions' names by year and discipline and often include multiple disciplines. I don't know how many of them there are, I'm afraid to look. —Alalch E. 02:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Maybe merge with Template:Xiangqi at the Asian Games. The current template does have too few links to be useful, but it can be merged with Template:Xiangqi at the Asian Games (removing the country links which shouldn't be included). Gonnym (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:32, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Conservatism in India

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Improvements, modifications, and other updates to this template seem to be in order, but there is no consensus to delete it outright. No prejudice against renomination if talk page discussion breaks down (or doesn't happen). Primefac (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

An absolute mishmash of links that have no coherent theme. The links clearly tied to conservatism are not India-specific; those that are India-specific aren't clearly linked to conservatism. The biographies listed appear to be largely arbitrary. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete: It'd be more productive, in my opinion, to work on our articles related to Conservatism in India before we try to create navboxes for it. — EarthDude (Talk) 08:53, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep: Since there are templates related to conservatism in many countries, there is no reason why only the Conservatism in India template should be removed. Also, existing template are quite beneficial. ProgramT (talk) 07:28, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
Please see WP:OSE. The existence of other valid navboxes does not justify this one. It also has little to do with the validity of the subject - Conservatism in India is obviously notable - and more to do with the arbitrariness of the collected articles. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
bro this is very important template use your brain with the growing rw and rss extremism it's extremely necessary don't delete it u would be foolish to do so. ~2026-35577-11 (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep Most of it is useful description of history/ideologies prominent in India; I don't recognize anyone in Intellectuals/Commentators though Noida-gamer (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Template:Conservatism_In_India_2 here's a revision i made
  • Used WP:DUE for navbox weightage (even though it's not official policy) - Indian Muslim Conservatives are still ~15% of the population, so giving 50% or 0% representation would be out of place, even if ideologies seem contradictory in historic contexts
  • Arbitrary biographies deleted Noida-gamer (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
My concerns remain. Conservatism is not a frequently used label in coverage of Indian politics, and when it is used, there is no consensus as to what it means. I see no means of choosing a coherent set of ideologies (by what reasoning is Swadeshi included?), or parties, or organizations, or history (of all the articles about actions taken by BJP governments, how are the ones listed to be chosen? Why is the Shah Bano case there?). Sidebars are useful when the overarching topic has coherence. Otherwise categories are more than sufficient. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
> Conservatism is a cultural, social, and political philosophy and ideology that seeks to promote and preserve traditional institutions, customs, and values Conservatism
Many differing traditional institutions in India are conservative and non-homogenous (as for any country), WP:NAVBOX does not cite coherent ideology as a reason but rather coherent navigation pertaining to the topic of a page. Categories don't provide fast navigability to topics users are interested in.
> of all the articles about actions taken by BJP governments, how are the ones listed to be chosen
The ones chosen aren't primarily about BJP but rather sociopolitical events in India in which conservatism has been a focus or prominent side of a modern issue.
> Why is the Shah Bano case there
The case guided a political shift which ended up with the BJP in power, and includes Islamic conservatism and their impact on Indian politics. Noida-gamer (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Swadeshi is fair though, it's more economic, I deleted that Noida-gamer (talk) 16:06, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Those are reasonable arguments but they are entirely original research, which carries no weight. There are not high-quality reliable sources about conservatism in India that make these links. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete train wreck of a template, WP:OSE is not an argument. Visual eyesore that adds nothing and violates WP:SIDEBAR. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep The existence of various seemingly contradictory ideologies under one "Conservatism in India" sidebar is backed by scholarly academic work [1][2][3] and these ideologies are weighted in proportion to their influence to Conservatism in India in Template:Conservatism_In_India_2. Noida-gamer (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

References

  1. Jaffrelot, Christophe (October 2017). "The Roots and Varieties of Political Conservatism in India". Studies in Indian Politics. 5 (2): 205–217. doi:10.1177/2321023017727968. Retrieved June 21, 2026.
  2. Pirbhai, M. Reza (March 9, 2020). "Hindutva and the Meaning of Modernity". Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, Georgetown University. Retrieved June 21, 2026.
  3. Carpentier de Gourdon, Côme (March 19, 2025). "Traditionalism, Conservatism, and the Perennial Philosophy (Part I)". Chintan. India Foundation. Retrieved June 21, 2026.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused module. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 08:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 06:09, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox civilian attack

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdraw. Going to try a different idea... (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:29, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox civilian attack with Template:Infobox event.
There is significant overlap here. Obviously not every event is a civilian attack, but based on the parameters in the Infoboxes, every civilian attack can be considered an event. There are a few parameters that would need to be added to event, but nothing major. Worth noting the numerous aliases that Infobox event already has. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:38, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Oppose as strongly as possible, per the last time this was nominated. All writers/sportspeople/politicians are people, so why don't they use the people template? No. To quote my argument from last time: "The event template is extremely ugly and I despise having to use it in any instance as an editor of many relevant articles. We have had this argument twice before. Civ attack is a more specific usage with different parameters, tailored to its usage. I like it better. Several of the relevant civ attack parameters would be weird on the event one. ... the template is 99% used for mass murder, crime and terrorist attacks, for which it fits the terminology. Using natural disaster terminology on murder gives the wrong impression. All those "arguably a little odd" parameters have been discussed at length." Infobox event is aggressively convoluted and is trying to do far too many things at once, it is a mess, a template for the broadest thing imaginable, "things that happen", is not ideal for most circumstances. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Note: it should also be noted that there is considerable overlap of hundereds of pages where BOTH Infoboxes are used just to be able to display all necessary information. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
@Zackmann08 This is almost entirely due to one specific parameter:
Infobox event has a sentence= parameter, while infobox civilian attack does not. It is entirely used on infobox event to add it to the civilian attack infobox. This is stupid because almost all of the articles using the parameter are using infobox civilian attack. Infobox event should not have a sentence parameter and Infobox civilian attack probably should, but my requests to add it were denied because it needed an RFC or something.
But this one mistake that people have been complaining about for years and which template editors have refused to fix despite years of people asking is not worth combining the template for speeches and floods and random things with the rather specialized terrorism and mass murder template. Simply add the One Parameter that is an issue to the other template. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
@PARAKANYAA: while I respect the hell out of you, I think you are focusing too much on the NAME of the template and not the functionality of the template.
  • {{Infobox sportsperson}} has information specifically about their participation in sports that is not relevant to non-sports persons
  • {{Infobox officeholder}} has information specifically about holding office that is not relevant to non-officeholders.
There is no lack of overlap between {{Infobox event}} and {{Infobox civilian attack}}. Both have lists of missing, injuries, deaths. I 100% agree that civilian attack should have the sentence parameter. That seems to be one thing missing, but that would seem to speak to a good reason to merge them, not a good reason to keep them separate... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:59, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
There are multiple parameters that only make sense in this template, dfens=, judge=, perpetrators=, assailants=, weapon/weapons=, numparts= and they are styled very differently. Additionally, the death language used on infobox event= is different than the one used in a way which I think makes it less appropriate for use on serious crimes.
I agree there is redundancy, but this is because infobox event is a total travesty that is trying to be 40 different things and it is doing all of them poorly. Merging the more specialized infoboxes into the one middling jack-of-all-trades one is bad and does not help clarity. Probably that template needs a culling of what parameters are not frequently used and what it is used for.
Also, I don't take this as a personal offense or anything, hah. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
@PARAKANYAA: Let me propose a novel idea that has NOT been discussed at previous TFDs (that I can see). What if we converted {{Infobox civilian attack}} to a wrapper for {{Infobox event}}?! This is more akin to the way that we have {{Infobox astronaut}} or {{Infobox artist}}, both of which have very customized parameters, but use the generic {{Infobox person}} as a base.
Let me put it this way, I 100% agree that NOT every event is a civilian attack so placing all the civlian attack params on every event doesn't make sense... BUT, can we agree that every cilivian attack is a form of an event? Are there any parameters on {{Infobox event}} that would be bad to have on {{Infobox civilian attack}}? We could keep the templates separate, but reduce the overhead maintenance by making it a wrapper... Thoughts on that idea? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:15, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Note: the past 3 merge discussions, which all came to keep Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 28#Template:Infobox civilian attack Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 31#Template:Infobox civilian attack Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1#Template:Infobox civilian attack PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep both add {{{ sentence}}} to {{Infobox civilian attack}}. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:07, 21 June 2026 (UTC).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 29. Primefac (talk) 07:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox German railway vehicle/list of transclusions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:20, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused template subpage that is outdated. A current list can always be generated from "What links here". – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-art-US-1996

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 29. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-Turkey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions. Applicable pages may have been moved to Commons, which is where public domain files typically live. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Public domain images belong on Commons and their templates live there. Gonnym (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-ROC-GOV

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 29. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-Iraq

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions. Applicable pages may have been moved to Commons, which is where public domain files typically live. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Public domain images belong on Commons and their templates live there. Gonnym (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RfBAG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. This template may have been used a few times back in 2008, but it does not appear to have been used since then, with no ill effects (see Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations for examples). – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Hasn't been used in over 13 years based on the unused reports. Gonnym (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SindhPA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions or incoming links from discussions to explain why it was created. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:39, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete as unused and undocumented. Gonnym (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:KF Shkupi squad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused roster navbox. According to KF_Shkupi#Current_squad, the current roster has no blue-linked players. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:17, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, not needed. GiantSnowman 18:18, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Minnesota United FC 2 squad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused roster navbox with only two blue links. According to Minnesota United FC 2, the current roster has no blue-linked players. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:17, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, not needed. GiantSnowman 18:18, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Divisions of Scottish Baronage sidebar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in 2024. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RugbyLeague

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 07:58, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

No transclusions, categories, or incoming links. Created in February 2026. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete, I have several concerns with the use of the template:
  • The usage example for Paramatta Women does not work as there is no image, and most combinations have no icon as it is missing from the template/data even thought there are related images on commons.
  • The image file names suggest that it will only work for the 2026 (current) season. It would need to be adapted to work for different seasons, possibly with the addition of a parameter for this, and addition of new files to the template/data.
  • It uses a different set of icons from {{league icon}}, the standard used throughout most rugby league articles.
  • Possible copyright issue for the images as they appear to be same as used on leagueunlimited.com with small NRL and club logos added.
EdwardUK (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blocks Universe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:41, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused template created by a blocked editor. Gonnym (talk) 12:30, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RussiaAdmMunRef/sve/munlist/krasnoufimsky

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused reference template. Gonnym (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep, I restored the usage. Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 12:30, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SMRT code transfer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:41, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused rail related template. Gonnym (talk) 08:40, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:State of the Nation Address (Philippines) date

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Primefac (talk) 07:59, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused date template. Gonnym (talk) 08:40, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Removed from use almost exactly 24 hours before this TfD was filed, and I was on travel so I had zero time to realize that the page this is used on had removed the template. Anyways, it's back to being used. Keep. Chlod (say hi!) 13:48, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 05:18, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:S-par/ag-sen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused link template. Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Barbarians Autumn 2025 squad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused squad template for non-championship match. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:43rd Parliament of British Columbia - Members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:39, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused as 43rd Parliament of British Columbia#Members already has the data there. Gonnym (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1947 Philippine Senate election results

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy close as said edit was reverted due to it linking to a dab page, linking to a wrong party (Democratic Party (Philippines) did not exist in 1947), and that the footnotes were removed. Howard the Duck (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pagesize table

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The template isn't used anywhere. It was last used in this section on a user page by JPxG, but I rewrote the section using {{for nowiki}}. Chrisahn (talk) 01:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep It's in use; is this really the most pressing issue we have to deal with? jp×g🗯️ 01:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
I don't know when or how it was adopted as a policy that anything seeing occasional use had to be aggressively driven out of templatespace; I'm so very, very, very sorry as to have written templates prior to this being the case, and rest assured, I will not be doing so voluntarily again. If I had known that half a decade later someone would be going through the list of templates every single day to aggressively TfD every one that was at that moment not being used in enough places, I never would have bothered in the first place. Please forgive me for this sin. jp×g🗯️ 01:11, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Libre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Old template unused in mainspace. Template:Free culture and open content does this topic a lot better. Sign2 (talk) 00:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2027 Men's T20 World Cup Americas Regional Final

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete following subst and conversion (if necessary) to LST. Primefac (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Just plain wikitables should be replaced with WP:LST instead based on the precedent TfD. Vestrian24Bio 10:52, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Also nominating the remaining templates as well. Vestrian24Bio 10:54, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Comment: @Vestrian24Bio none of these pages are tagged. Gonnym (talk) 14:51, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep - Not a single one of these templates was tagged for deletion thus violating TFD procedure. Not a valid TFD to start with. I will note that Vestrian24Bio ignored 2 separate pings about this issue after their nomination of 50+ templates. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:17, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
So sorry, didn't see any of the mentions; been a bit busy with some off-wiki stuff. I'll tag the pages shortly. Vestrian24Bio 12:06, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep Changed to neutral. Unless I am misunderstanding the proposal. Many (if not all) of these tables are used in at least two places. 1) the specific tournament to which they relate; 2) a summary of the qualification pathway for a particular tournament; 3) the season summary page. For example Template:2026 Men's T20 World Cup Europe Sub-regional Qualifier A is used in 2026 Men's T20 World Cup Europe Sub-regional Qualifier A, 2028 Men's T20 World Cup qualification and Associate international cricket in 2026. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs1jac (talk • contribs)
@Bs1jac: The tables would be replaced by Help:Labeled section transclusion, similar to what's being done at 2026 Men's T20 World Cup and 2026 Women's T20 World Cup. The points table would be directly placed on the articles instead of templatespace from which they would be transcluded to the summary pages such as International cricket in 2026 or Associate international cricket in 2026 as well as the qualification pages such as 2026 Men's T20 World Cup qualification or 2027 Cricket World Cup qualification. Vestrian24Bio 13:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
@Bs1jac...? Vestrian24Bio 09:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Understood. Don't really see the problem in having the template, but I haven't created any of these (as far I remember) partly as there is inconsistency on which are kept and which are not. Bs1jac (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
@Bs1jac: about half of these templates were actually started by me. I've nominated all of the T20 World Cup templates here, and I intend to do the same with all cricket events step by step.
Also, an advantage of not using templates is that the points table and scorecards would be on the same page. So, an editor can easily update them without having to switch between pages. Vestrian24Bio 01:26, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
My only issue with transclusions is that I think it forces a line of text above/below each table, meaning that pages like qualification and season summaries end up with that text repeated multiple times. Also does the reference get displayed correctly on all pages?Bs1jac (talk) 05:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
@Bs1jac: what line of text..? As an existing example, the tables at International cricket in 2025–26#2026 Men's T20 World Cup are directly transcluded from the article, which doesn't have any difference from the other tables on that page.
Another example below: Of the two tables displayed one is from the template and one is from directly from the article. No difference and refs are carried through just fine..

{{2023 Men's T20 World Cup Africa Qualifier Regional Final}}

Final standings
Pos Team Pld W L NR Pts NRR Qualification
1  Namibia (H) 6 6 0 0 12 2.658 Qualified for the 2024 Men's T20 World Cup
2  Uganda 6 5 1 0 10 1.334
3  Zimbabwe 6 4 2 0 8 2.922 Eliminated
4  Kenya 6 3 3 0 6 −0.911
5  Nigeria 6 1 4 1 3 −1.026
6  Tanzania 6 1 5 0 2 −1.507
7  Rwanda 6 0 5 1 1 −4.303
Source: ESPNcricinfo[1]
(H) Hosts
Vestrian24Bio 09:11, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Ah ok must be different to previous methods e.g. see Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 Nordic Cup, which uses
Pos Team Pld W L NR Pts NRR
1  Denmark 4 3 1 0 6 1.981
2  Norway 5 3 2 0 6 0.457
3  Sweden 5 2 3 0 4 0.052
4  Finland 6 2 4 0 4 −1.572
Source: ESPNcricinfo[2]

Bs1jac (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

@Bs1jac: Yeah, this uses the parser function {{#section}} instead of the template {{excerpt}}, so visually the outcome is pretty much similar.
So, do you strike your keep !vote and support the proposal..? Vestrian24Bio 10:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

References

  1. 2023 Men's T20 World Cup Africa regional final, points table: standings at ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  2. "Nordic T20 Cup 2023 Points table". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 21 May 2023.
Delete all and use section titles to transclude where needed. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:05, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2026 Women's T20 World Cup standings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after subst and converstion to use LST. Primefac (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Just plain wikitables should be replaced with WP:LST instead based on the precedent TfD. Vestrian24Bio 10:49, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Also nominating the remaining templates as well. Vestrian24Bio 10:50, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Comment: @Vestrian24Bio none of these pages are tagged. Gonnym (talk) 14:51, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep - Not a single one of these templates was tagged for deletion thus violating TFD procedure. Not a valid TFD to start with.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:16, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
So sorry, didn't see any of the mentions; been a bit busy with some off-wiki stuff. I'll tag the pages shortly. Vestrian24Bio 12:06, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
@Gonnym and Zackmann08: all of the templates in this nomination (women's) has been tagged now. Suppose it could relisted for another 7 days now... Vestrian24Bio 13:27, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Yeah, it would be best so no one can claim they weren't informed of this discussion and then having us revert everything that happened. Gonnym (talk) 14:27, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Zackmann08 I assume your !vote can be withrdawn and/or modified given the above replies? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 08:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Yup. Struck my !vote. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:39, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Subst and delete as single-use instances of Module:Sports table. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Country data Nationalist government

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Per WP:DEL10, which includes "Redundant or otherwise useless templates". This template is not used on any pages in the WP:MAINSPACE.

Furthermore, as established in Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)#Merge proposal, this is a government and not a country. Thus, it should not have a country data template. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Country data Beiyang government

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Per WP:DEL10, which includes "Redundant or otherwise useless templates". This template is not used on any pages in the WP:MAINSPACE.

Furthermore, as established in Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)#Merge proposal, this is a government and not a country. Thus, it should not have a country data template. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SNH48

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

A navbox with this much unlinked text is an article masquerading as a navbox. As it stands, it is useless for navigation. WP:EXISTING. --woodensuperman 12:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

keep; is it not possible to simply remove the unlinked entries if they are so bothersome? this does not seem like a big deal to me jp×g🗯️ 17:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete - Best case scenario WP:BLOWITUP. Per nom this is an article masquerading as a navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:55, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep, I guess. I've removed the non-links. It still can use some cleanup but at least the massive wall of non-links is gone. Gonnym (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Country data Provisional Government of the Republic of China (1912)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Per WP:DEL10, which includes "Redundant or otherwise useless templates". This template is not used on any pages in the WP:MAINSPACE.

Furthermore, as established in Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)#Merge proposal, this is a government and not a country. Thus, it should not have a country data template. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 03:10, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.